|
You did arrive at the right conclusion
that the Iranian, both Shi’ah and Sunni Imams of the 3rd
and 4th century Higra, maliciously created the myth of
Mohammad and Ayesha’s Nikah, despite the fact that Allah
has imposed the following restrictions, with respect to the selection
of the spouses, in order to facilitate a happy and harmonious married
life:
They should have comparable views about
the life in general, must have similar physical and mental attributes
and be of the same age. [57:37]
·
They must have come of
age, reached physical and mental maturity to make their own decisions
and must possess sufficient means of subsistence. [4:6]
·
They must be of sound
mind, have sufficient strength to brave the rigors of life and must be
full of vitality to enjoy the bliss of married life. [6:152]
It is imperative here to check up with
the Qur’an about Mohammad’s social behavior and the kinds of
commandments given to him by his Nourisher.
·
The verse 33:52
pronounces openly, ‘Mohammad your are forbidden to marry any other
woman, besides the one’s, who are already in your Nikah!’
·
As per Surah Al-Threem,
Mohammad had two wives at the time of his appointment to the exalted
position of the Messenger of Allah. Despite the clear-cut command of
the last revelation about his matrimonial limitations, how could
Mohammad do, whatever he had been reported to be accomplishing by the
compulsive Iranian liars, 300 years after his death? It does not make
any sense, as the Messengers of Allah strictly adhere to the
revelations they receive. Mohammad could never deviate from the
explicit instructions passed on to him pertaining to his marital life
and he could never indulge in the nefarious activities you have
mentioned on the basis of the purported ‘Islamic literature.’ It is
nothing but sordid kind of mudslinging on his impeccable character.
·
The verse 47:4, declares
a complete ban on all kinds of slavery and Mohammad personally
promulgated this proclamation of Allah, then how could he go against
it and commit the despicable acts that you blame him for? This kind of
character assassination is the height of spitefulness, which his
Iranian enemies leveled against him, because they are not a part of
the Muslim Ummah, but are the worshippers of Mazdak.
·
The verses 33:50-52
clearly show that at the time of receiving the high office of Allah’s
Messenger, he had only two wives. He was also forbidden from taking
new wives or divorcing his existing ones; then how could he go out and
marry women left and right? This evidence destroys the malicious slur
you have concocted against him.
·
In the verse 33:4-5,
Allah forbids the adoption of other people’s sons or daughters.
Mohammad could never have gone against that clear-cut directive and
declared Zaid as his son. This is an unadulterated falsehood. It means
the story built upon this incident did not materialize ever, as he
never adopted any son. Zainab, the name of Zaid’s alleged wife does
not appear anywhere in the Qur’an. In addition, according to the verse
33:55, Mohammad was the figurative father of his nation and could not
marry any woman as per the direct command of Allah to maintain his
exalted image within his nation. Therefore, the marriage of Zainab
with him is nothing but a blatant lie of the worst kind. To find the
truth about this fictitious event in detail, you should get hold of my
book entitled, ‘The Qur'anic concept of Nikah vs. Religious
prostitution.’
The Quran has an excellent continuation
of discussions on all aspects of human life, without any abrupt
changes of topics. The screwed up translations might give that
impression. Not a single existing translation of the Qur’an has done
justice to the last revelation of Allah. The simple and
straightforward message of the Qur’an has been corrupted, though the
text remains intact. In fact, the legendary repetitive style of Arabic
vernacular has been utilized to make the subject matter easily
comprehensible. In order to reach the real connotation of each word,
term and expression, it is essential to follow the built-in procedure
laid down in the Qur’an. All a person has to do is to check every
word, used with respect to various contexts in different verses, to
grasp its real significance applicable to each and every aya.
Only this way, it is possible to completely understand the over and
undertones of each phrase, expression presented in each Surah
[chapter].
Consistent with the verses 23:5, 24:30,
70:29, 24:3, all Messengers of Allah, including Mohammad, were
righteous, honorable and immaculate individuals, who guarded their
unblemished characters in the fortress of Nikah. In view of
this irrefutable evidence, it is ridiculous and preposterous to say
that Mohammad along with all other Messengers of Allah were debauched
and decadent lechers.
In the presence of the above mentioned
basic tenets of the Qur'an for Nikah between a man and a woman,
how could Mohammad possibly wed a girl, who is said to be 6, 9 or 15
years old, when he personally, was close to 50? This tantamount to
open defiance of the revelation that he received, which he would never
have even dared to think about. The piles of Ahadith and the
accounts of Sunnah, pertaining to this subject, are nothing but
a pack of lies, which the Iranian Imams, his most vindictive
antagonists, fabricated to ridicule Mohammad the Arab and invalidate
the constitution he implemented.
In addition, Ayesha and Khadijah,
Zainab, and Fatma [non existing daughter of Mohammad] are non-Arabic
names and there is no truth in the myth that Mohammad ever married
non-Arab women. The fact of the matter is, these names have Iranian
origin and the Ahadith manufacturers of these stories forgot
this aspect, while instituting these names in their falsehoods.
BEST REGARDS
Akhtar sherazi
|