|
PROLOGUE |
|
Humans belong to a distinct species on the face of the earth, which is dissimilar from all the rest, because of the three characteristic peculiarities, which are, development of articulate languages, power of verbal expression, and that of writing. They possess intense desire to socialize, and perhaps for that reason, the philosophers identify them as social animals. Homo sapiens, according to the most modern anthropological estimates, appeared, sometimes, in between 200,000 to 120,000 years ago. This species developed a divergent course right from the very beginning, as compared to all others, which resulted in the formation of close-knit human habitats. Written history of humans goes back to 7,000 years, and Noah, the first Messenger of Allah, came around 6,000 years from now. The administrative and economic system he established remained in force for almost 950 years in his part of the world, though he personally lived for 50 years. From that point onward, Allah continued to reveal His constitution, together with the code of ethics, through selected Apostles for the guidance of humans, which ended with the arrival of Mohammad, the last Messenger, over 1,400 years ago. The reason for putting a stop to the continuity of revelation being, the maturity of humanity, which in the presence of the Qur’an could establish a viable, people friendly, system for managing the day-to-day affairs of the state. Allah’s set of laws promote love and affection among humans, giving impetus to collective good, as compare to personal gain. The first and the foremost message of the Qur’an is to live for others, and for that reason Allah’s Charter of Rights and Obligations cuts out lust for power and craving for riches, on personal basis. Whoever comes to this world lives for ones’ self; there is nothing great about that. The Qur’an wants every human to live for others. That is the real purpose of life. The same message appears in the verse 59:9, the translation of which is as under:
‘Mohammad and his comrades, who are working together for the establishment of the divine social order, are determined to create a society, wherein each member shall be much more concerned about the sustenance, enhancement, and development of others, as compared to achieving personal objectives.’
As already said above, the people living under a government established upon the constitution of the Qur’an, remain much more concerned about the nourishment, improvement and security of others, as compared to their own. During the time of adversity and hardship, this consciousness increases manifold; they get on with the mission of serving all concerned, and do not rest until every one can breathe easy. Undoubtedly, only that society achieves excellence in all lifestyles, whose members care more for the needs of others, in both normal and extraordinary circumstances, as opposed to their personal convenience and requirement. As per the Qur’an, the most deleterious elements for the human psyche are a state of uncertainty, an umbrella of fear, and a consciousness of desperation. These collectively and even severely destroy human ingenuity, because the mental capacity of a nation or an individual is stymied under those conditions. A typical example is that of the French Revolution [1789–1799], which was a pivotal period in the history of French, European and Western civilization. During this time, republicanism replaced the awe-inspiring absolute monarchy in France, and the country's Roman Catholic Church, a major collaborative partner of the royalty, was forced to undergo a radical restructuring. The revolution is widely seen as a major turning point in the history of Western democracy—from the age of absolutism and aristocracy, to the age of the citizenry, as the dominant political force. The slogan of the French Revolution was Liberty, equality, fraternity for all, but death to every coercive force. The Industrial revolution had never materialized in Europe, if the French Revolution had not occurred. It was the freedom of thinking and choice that brought a change from the agrarian to the industrial way of life. For that very reason, Allah states in the Qur’an:
When you shall establish the government based on the constitution of the Qur’an, all of your worries including that of foreign domination, and internal instability shall vanish. You shall create a progressive, prosperous, and peaceful society. [2:38-39]
‘On this planet, whoever will follow Our guidance, shall enjoy a peaceful and tranquil life. Apprehension about external aggression, together with anxiety, regarding internal instability and uncertainty, shall cease to exist. On the contrary, whoever will reject or conceal Our guidance from the people, shall live in a social setup, riddled with domestic insecurity and dread of outer invasion. Because of this situation, they shall experience uncertainty, personal dissatisfaction, and mental agitation. They will live in the blazing hell of anguish, stress and depression. Each person of that community will feel the intense heat of their wrongdoings, disorder and confusion. They shall remain part of a corrupt and immoral society, until they return to the protection of Our divine social order.’
Consequently, with the disappearance of apprehension and trepidation, the community becomes very productive. Peace of mind is the key to progress in any social setup, which is evidently lacking in the Muslim majority countries right now, and that is the reason they are lacking behind the rest of the world not in terms of decades, but centuries. A brilliant example is that of China, which in the year 1900, because of the warlord culture, was the weakling of the East. The countries like Belgium and Japan were more powerful and had the guts to rule over parts of that country. The revolution led by Mao Zedong finally resulted in the formation of the first Communist government in 1949, which threw the corrupt democratic administration of Chiang Ki Shek into the Red China Sea, along with him. Since then that country is making steady progress, and has now attained the status of a major world power, second perhaps to USA.
Schedule of Five Daily Prayers
Compatible with, or in continuation of the preceding discussion, the Qur’an declares; all religions of the world work upon the tenet of fear and fright. The respective priesthoods maintain an environment of trepidation to keep their followers in line. Collectively, the concept of sin and its punishment is their most effective weapon. However, the Qur’an points out the fact; the situation was not very different at the arrival of Mohammad. The Jewish rabbis, the Christian priests and the Sabaean ministers were promoting the corrupted versions of the original revelations of their respective Apostles. All three religions towed the same line of fear mongering, to keep their sheep in their corresponding corrals. Though, the original charters had built-in guarantee pertaining to the freedom of choice, expression, and pursuit, yet the prevalent religions had taken a diametrically opposite turn, changing liberty into bonding with religiously motivated dread of hell, doomsday, the Day of Judgment, besides many more. When Mohammad began working on his given assignment, the Qur’an clearly shows, there were four main groups opposing this peaceful program, namely Jews, Sabaeans, Christians and Magians. The Sabaeans, originally from Syria, were the followers of the Apostle Idris, and followed the book, called Pages of Seth. With the passage of time, like other nations, they also corrupted the original message of their prophets, converting the divine social order into a religion, comprising of prayers, seven or five times a day. They too prayed for the dead, while standing straight up and fasted for thirty days. Their calendar followed the lunar system, instead of the solar, and they celebrated Eid festival. However, they also worshiped the stars of the firmament, and venerated Ka’bah. There are certain quotes about them in the literature of Ahadith, taken from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, [redirected from Sabaean], presented below, as such, without any editing:
· Qatadah ‘ibn Di’amah (d736 AD) wrote: "The Sabians worshipp angels, read Zabur, pray five ritual prayers. · Abu ‘Abdultah said: "The word saba’a means “The one who is a Proselyte.”" · Hasan al-Basri (d728 AD) wrote: "the Sabian religion resembles the Magians and they worship angels." · Hasan al-Basri (d728 AD) wrote: "They read the Zabur and pray facing a qiblah." · Qatadah ‘ibn Di’amah (d736 AD) wrote: "they pray towards the sun." · Al-Shaafa’i said: "Their case is to be examined further; if they resemble the Christians in basic matters but they differ from them in some minor issues, then the jizya is to be taken from them. But if they differ from them in basic issues of religion then their religion cannot be approved of by taking the jizya from them." And he elaborated elsewhere: "They are a kind of Christian." · ‘Abdul al-Zanad (d.747 AD) wrote: "The Sabians are from “Kutha” in Iraq, they believe in prophets, fast 30 days in a year, and pray 5 times daily towards the Yemen." (NB "towards the Yemen" is equivalent to facing south) · Ziyad ‘ibn ‘Abihi (d. 672 AD) who was the governor of Iraq during the first Umayyad caliph Mur awiyah wrote: "The Sabians believe in the prophets and pray five times daily."
The verse of the Qur’an translated below, provides pertinent information about the established religions of Jews, Sabaeans Magians and Christians, when Mohammad arrived in the world. As already pointed out above, all religions keep a strong hold on their respective followers through the devilish forces of fear, anxiety, and anguish, especially that of excommunication, in case of deviation from the path shown by the clergy. For that reason alone, a majority of the adherents remain in a kind of sustained emotional trauma. Mohammad invited them all to enjoy freedom from the baseless forces of religious trepidation, by joining the universal emancipation movement, which he and his companions were trying to promote, with the guidance of the Qur’an. The verse 5:69 of the Qur’an provides details of the open invitation of Mohammad extended to the devotees of all religions, and cults established in the world, with the assurance that dread, anxiety, and fright along with all other social traumas can be eliminated from their respective communities forever, if they adopt the norms, the last revelation of Allah presents.
‘Surely, there are people who believe in Allah, without formally opting for any particular religion. There are also those who have accepted a religion and believe in Allah like Jews, Christians, Sabaeans and Muslims [by birth or through conversion, with the adoption of a Muslim name]. However, Allah does not acknowledge such groundless convictions or values, cherished by these communities. The only way to believe in Allah is through the utilization of human intellect, provided by Him, and then following His commands to produce an excellent social order, beneficial for both the present and the coming generations. Such a living also secures peaceful continuation of life in the hereafter, when its earthly part ends. Such communities shall be amply rewarded through the establishment of stable and peaceful governments, or social setups free of all types of trepidations like uncertainty, anxiety, worry and stress.’
Schedule of Three Daily Supplications
The followers of prince Agha Khan [Agha Khani Cult] and Ahal-e-Qur’an sect of Pakistan follow the schedule of three daily supplications. This was the traditional Zoroastrian practice of worshipping their Min and Yasdah gods, three times per day, which the Muslims straightforwardly copied. It is interesting to note that the specific prayer routine pursued by Sunni, Wahabi, Shi’ah, Agha Khani, Ahl-e-Qur’an Ahamadi and many other sects are remarkably different from one other. However, all of them carry on such nefarious activities in the name of Allah, perhaps to justify the existence of their religious franchises, though by doing so; they rip apart the unity of Muslim Ummah, which is the basic memorandum of the Qur’an. The Zoroastrian ritual of supplication was unknown in the life and time of Mohammad, and his stalwart male and female comrades. That is why they never adopted that ridiculous religious rite, which made in roads in the life style of Muslims almost three centuries, after their departure from this world. The fact remains, the addition of this alien element in the daily routine of Muslims came because of a deadly conspiracy hatched by the Iranian Aimmah [plural of Imam or leader, especially religious], against Allah, Mohammad and the Qur’an. Through the verse 2:62, the Qur’an enlightens the entire humanity; there are no magic pills, potions or plans to solve local, regional and world problems. On the contrary, it requires strenuous constant, consistence and continued efforts with the guidance of the divine directives, to maintain peace, prosperity or progress in the world, and to eliminate the environment of fear, uncertainty, and hopelessness, upon which all global religions thrive.
‘If all communities on this planet try to implement Allah’s constitution, accepting His sovereignty only, along with taking right steps to achieve excellent results, for the present and the future generations, then their struggle shall be amply rewarded. They shall receive their gifts, in both worlds, in the form of peaceful, contented, happy and safe living. Such a society shall be free from all kinds of trepidations, worries, insecurities and isolation. In fact, freedom can be secured and protected, by attaining indomitable defensive deterrence through technological advancement. For instance, if an antagonist possesses excellence in the field of armament, the protagonist must have par excellence in the same area. Moreover, all of it must be achieved by utilizing wisdom and faculty of reasoning, provided by the Sustainer.’
However, Mohammad and his companions [both male and female] were well aware of Sabaeans, who used to pray five or seven times a day. For that very reason, Mohammad invited them to work with him, in order to eliminate three, five or even seven prayers they went for every day, together with erasing all kinds of angst from their minds, which were prevalent in their social setup. The Qur’an is against all rituals, especially, pertaining to the Sabaean or Iranian Nimaz, and others associated with it like Wuzu [Wadu], Azan [call for prayer], Darood-o-Salam and non-Quranic discourses before the time of Friday and Eids prayers. The administrative and fiscal program presented by the Qur’an, in the form of Sallat and Zakah, is a death warrant issued by Allah for all religions and the alleged spiritual institutions, presently existing under the cover of Islam, promoting worthless and ridiculous time wasting rituals. The administrative and economic system of the Qur’an, when fully implemented creates real bond of affection among humans, who enthusiastically work together for the common good of all. At the same time, they become very close to Allah, who loves to guide them through his eternal laws. In fact, Allah is synonymous with His primordial set of laws, which govern the entire cosmos, both in the micro and macro spheres. His love, in the real sense is exclusively reserved for those, who strictly live by His commandments, embodied in His last revelation, the Qur’an. There is no other way of pleasing Him, or getting close to him. When the humans follow His directives, he bestows upon them bounties beyond their wildest imaginations, as a mark of his affection. All kinds of worries, anxieties and trepidations become non-existent in such a society, and the human character shines as a brilliantly incandescent new star.
Historical Perspective of Prayers
According to Mu’awiyah, five daily supplications, funeral prayers, incantation of Dua, and celebration of Eid were alien rituals for the Muslim Ummah, until 672 AD. However, during the reign of Ziyad -Ibn- Zanad [in the time of Umayyad Caliph], governor of Iraq in 672 AD, it surfced that a sect known as Sabaean, the flowers of Prophet Idress, were carrying on the five or seven daily prayers, Darood and Salam, Eid celebration, and many others rituals. During the reign of Abbasid Dynasty [strict autocracy in the garb of caliphate] extended over five centuries [750-1258 A.D.], the Iranian influence was at its zenith, both in the court and the harems of the royals. The caliphs gave them a free hand to do whatever they liked, on the proviso to make their lives easier in return. Under the circumstances, the administrative and the economic system of Sallat and Zakah were stamped out completely, paving the way for the autocratic rule. The Muslim priesthood, especially, the Sunni and Shi’ah Aimmah did the dirty work for the caliphs [Muslim kings] by introducing most outrageous religious ritual, Nimaz. They transmuted the governmental concept of Sallat into five daily supplications, a mode of worship that was very popular among the Zoroastrians, who regularly practiced it to make their god Yasdah happy. Strangely enough, the Muslim Ummah is doing the same for the last millennium. The ritual of prayer proved to be very divisive for the once united Ummah, and played a pivotal role in the cult formation among the Muslims. In fact, the acceptance of prayers by the followers of Mohammad, opened the Pandora’s Box of secondary rites and customs like Darood-o-Salam, Zikar, private distribution of Zakah [ at the rate of 2.5% on yearly savings], besides many more. The moment monarchy in the form of Banu Ummayad dynasty took over power; it was the end of the people friendly government based on the constitution of the Qur’an, which Mohammad and his associates established after long and arduous struggle, spread over couple of decades. Hereditary autocracy got a foothold, which is diametrically opposed to the basic tenets of the last revelation. The power hungry autocrats, in the garb of caliphs, kept the Aimmah along with the Muslim priesthood on the leash, which were ready to do every service to please their masters. They deliberately divided the Qur’an illiterate, or just in name Muslims into countless sects and factions. Of course, according to the code of the Qur’an, it is an unpardonable offence, but the caliphs, their cohorts, and the conniving clergy did not attach much importance to it, as the charter of the Qur’an was the biggest obstacle in their way, which had to go, anyways. The Aimmah created sects in Islam, and their descendents strengthened and widened the influence of all such divisions for personal benefits, and for the pleasure of the royalty. It is erroneous to believe; ‘the policy of divide and rule’ was the brainchild of the British hegemony in India, whereas the fact remains, it originated over a millennium ago, as the biggest conspiracy against Allah, Mohammad and the Qur’an, in the corridors of power, within the Muslim caliphate. Now the situation is much worst, as the propagation of sects and factions is continuing from the embryonic stage. Babies are born in a particular sect and it is going on for centuries, except the relatively new franchises like Ahamadi, which is not even a hundred years old yet. Like inheritance of an estate, one also gets the gift of denomination at the time of birth. Such people keep on defending their particular faith associated with their respective sects until death, and always remain ready to fight for it. Ugly sectarian violence is prevalent largely within the Muslim world, the worst example of which is visible in Iraq, where one hundred humans are dying every day, on an average, due to this cause alone. This state of affairs is going on progressively for the last one thousand years. The sectarian hatred is so wide spread and deep that they cannot even pray together. For that very reason, they have separate mosques, and prefer to offer non- Quranic prayers in their respective places of worship. Even, they bury their dead in cemeteries reserved for the members of the specific sects only. Instead of learning the Qur’an and implementing it, they keep on discussing Shariah and Sunnah and regulating their lives accordingly. It is interesting to note, every sect has its own Sunnah and Shariah, and its followers adhere to that brand, vehemently. Islam, the dynamic way of life, functioning through an administration based on the constitution of the Qur’an, along with its particular fiscal policy, is now reduced to a bunch of worthless rituals, such as five daily prayers, worshipping the dead saints, and repetitive incantation of self-generated arbitrarily qualifying characteristics of Allah and Mohammad, through Darood and Salam. The common English synonyms of the noun ‘prayer’ are entreaty, plea appeal and request, whereas, the verb ‘pray’ has compatible words like implore, plead, beg and ask. Praying is the present continuous form of the verb, which the people do, to show their devotion to God, along with expressing their earnest desire for some worldly wish, which they believe, the super power they are imploring can easily fulfill. In fact, they believe, through such an action of theirs’, He can finally hear them, and respond to their pleas. The Muslims, besides doing all of the above, also want to show their Allah, how much they revere Him, and, simultaneously, how scared they are of Him. The Muslim prayer, identified as Sallat, by the literature of Ahadith and Sunnah, fabricated by the Shi’ah and Sunni Aimmah of Iran, three centuries after the death of Mohammad, is the most important pillar of Islam, and for that reason, a significant number out of 1.5 billion Muslims, the world over, prays five times a day. Almost every Islamic scholar, along with a vast majority of global Muslim population has strong, but strange faith that the edifice of Islam is firmly resting on top of five pillars, which are enumerated below:
However, this structural definition of Islam is very pathetic, as the Qur’an does not endorse it at all. This presentation is a monolithic approach to the subject of Sallat and Zakah, which constitute complementary building blocks of the state, created under the constitution of the Qur’an. The detailed discussions, based on concrete evidence would show the readers, what a heinous conspiracy was hatched against Allah, Mohammad and the Qur’an? How Sallat, which translates into the formation of a government, turned into a ritual of five daily prayers, and how Zakah, which means economic system established on voluntary basis, changed to 2.5% extreme kind of capitalist system based on charity on annual savings? Factually, there is a challenge for the Muslim priests, active in 75 Muslim and many non-Muslim countries, in minting money through donations, how they claim to be the custodian of the Qur’an, when they constantly defy its code with fabricated Ahadith, synthetic Sunnah and unlawful Fiqah. On top of that, they indulge, day and night, into forbidden practices of eulogizing Allah and Mohammad through Zikar and Darood-o-Salam, indulging in prayers with fictitious Adyah [plural of Dua] and conducting many other ceremonies, which are against the tenets of the Qur’an. The Muslim priesthood calls Islam a religion, which the Qur’an denies outright. The last revelation of Allah identifies it as Al-Deen, which does not translate into faith or belief, because it is a constitution, for not only Muslims, but also the entire humanity. A straightforward example is that of American constitution; it is a working document, according to which federal and provincial governments of that country function. No rituals are attached to it, because it is neither a dogma, nor a creed. The Muslim clergy, the real driver of religion Islam, stresses upon the ritual part only. According to this group, that is the only purpose, for which Allah kept on appointing Messenger after Messenger for over four and a half millennia, right from Noah to Mohammad. That shows the ignorance or rather perceptive bankruptcy of the alleged custodians of the Qur’an, who claim to disseminate the real knowledge of the Book among the Muslims. What a pity!
The purpose of writing the book, the prologue of which you are going through now, is to execute in-depth study of the terms Sallat and Zakah, exclusively from the Qur’an’s viewpoint, in order to find answers to the following pertinent questions:
o Does Allah really command Muslims to pray five times a day, together with paying charity? o If the answer to the above question is in the affirmative, then why Allah directs Muslims only to do so, exempting all other nations, which received the same charter? o Does it really guarantee the praying Muslims an abode in the so-called heaven, elaborately described by the deceptive Ahadith and Sunnah writing Aimmah of Iran? o What could Allah possibly intend to achieve from billions of supplications, performed by millions of Muslims, every day? o Hypothetically, if the objective and factual findings of this treatise prove beyond any doubt, Allah never directed Mohammad and his followers to pray five times a day or dish out any charity, then where would the innumerable Muslims stand, which had been doing something awful for the last 1,100 years, following their ridiculously ignorant Aimmah? o If the postulate of supplications turns out to be dead wrong, in view of the irrefutable evidence coming from the Qur’an, that Allah never gave any command for its commission, then who shall be responsible for the biggest blunder and disobedience in the human history, continuing on for over a millennium? o Undoubtedly, Allah’s basic principle maintaining this immensely vast cosmos is Cause and Effect, which means ‘nothing happens without reason.’ Then, how would the futile religious practices, like unwarranted worshipping ritual in the form of Nimaz, prevalent Hajj and Ummrah of the commoners, incantation of Darood-o-Salam, besides many others, would be justified in Allah’s court, and who would dare to do so?
In order to ascertain, what actions Allah wants the humans to take, and which ones to avoid, it is imperative to analyze the prevalent religious practices established within the file and rank of the Ummah, from the Qur’an’s viewpoint. This step is essential in view of the fact the Muslim clergy has been claiming throughout the ages that whatever they tell the people to do, is the command of Allah. They are strictly following the last revelation. Unfortunately, that is not the truth! As shall be proven during the course of this dissertation, they are, in fact, the biggest liars of the Islamic history. On the very outset, they get their queue from the literature of Ahadith and Sunnah, which in their opinion is as good as the Qur’an. They dare to equate the Qur’an with the Iranian crap, which came into existence almost three centuries after the death of Mohammad. The Aimmah, exclusively originating from Iran, were the real adversaries of Allah, the Qur’an, and Mohammad, the Arab. They deliberately authored the junk of Ahadith, Sunnah, Traditions and Fiqah, in the name of the last Messenger of Allah, to belittle him and his magnificent companions, besides creating contradictions among the clear-cut verses of the Qur’an. Since the emergence of professional priesthood along with three other cursed ‘novelties’ of the 4th century Higrah, namely eunuchs, mausoleums and Sufis, they have been claiming and issuing edicts to the effect, “We are following the directives of Allah for praying in the right and productive way.” Unedited English version of a few Ahadith from the so-called Imam Bukhari, are presented below, which deserve some deliberation:
‘The prayers should awaken believer’s heart to his Lord and to himself, and remind him the Day of Judgment.’ [Comment: The use of masculine pronouns means; this Ahadith is an exclusive for men and precludes women. This is against the tenets of the Qur’an, because Allah always addresses both masculine and feminine genders, together.]
‘Between a man and disbelief is only the abandonment of prayer.’ [Comment: According to Bukhari and Muslim, a non-praying Muslim is an infidel and a Kafir (non- Muslim).]
‘The covenant between us and them is prayer, so whoever abandons it has disbelieved.’ [Comment: This Ahadith is flawed, as it sounds more like a verse of the Qur’an than a statement of Mohammad. To create literature, which resembles the verses of the last revelation in format and style, is a serious offence against Allah’s code.]
Consequently, in view of the Islamic priesthood, performing supplications is like a complementary pass, or even better, a key to the main gate of paradise, as reported by the fake literature of Ahadith and Sunnah. Moreover, the one, who denies prayers, is not a Muslim in the first place. That is the main distinction between a Muslim and a non-Muslim. It is imperative here to find out, what the Qur’an states about Muslims and non-Muslims, in general. [17:70]
‘In accordance with the laws of Allah, every human being is equally honorable.’
The above verse does not make any distinction between human beings based on creed, color, ethnic origin, language, etc., and there is definitely no mention of supplications. This clearly means the fictitious prayers, stressed upon by Ahadith and Sunnah, do not play any role in the life of common people and are not even mentioned in the constitution of the Qur’an. Allah’s code is immutable and any addition is out of the question. The prayers that the Muslims are practicing all over the world, are not only superfluous, but constitute an offence against the Charter of Rights and Obligations endorsed by the Qur’an. In view of the current set of circumstances, and the deplorable condition of the Muslim Ummah, a change is inevitable. There seems to be a dire need of overhauling the Islam, the professional Muslim priesthood is presenting to the majority of Arabic illiterate Muslims, divided into hundred of sects, all over the world. The Muslim clergy has corrupted the Al-Deen into a religion over the centuries, which is the real problem that needs fixing. The human history provides ample evidence to the fact; the most problematic task to undertake, is bringing about a transformation in the views of the people, especially concerning, a touchy matter, like faith. It requires a revolution, which is not an everyday occurring. Despite the above considerations, a change is inexorable, because the Muslims have consistently ignored a very pertinent piece of information for 1400 years, which Allah presented to the entire humanity, through the medium of the Qur’an. The authors have made a meticulous effort to bring it out into the open through the detailed discussion of the terms Sallah and Zakah along with the following indispensable accessories of the ritual of supplication:
v Origin of Aazan [Adhan], or call for prayer v The reality of Wudu [ablution] v Recitation of Duas during supplications, not given in the Qur’an v Modules of prayers v Funeral prayer v Eulogizing Mohammad unnecessarily v Counting names of Allah and Mohammad on rosary beads v Celebrating Eid-e-Milad-un-Nabi v Giving out charity v Distribution of 2.5 % Zakah on annual savings v Real role of mosques in Muslim villages, towns and cities v The reality of fictitious Khutbat [religious sermons] delivered on Friday and Eidain [plural of Eid]
It seems essential to introduce briefly the above horrible additions here in the prologue, to prepare the readers for assimilating the factual meanings of the terms Sallah and Zakah, discussed at length in the book. An attempt has been made to show the world, how the Iranian Aimmah misled the Ummah, through their personal interpretations of pertinent terms of the Qur’an, relevant to the subject under reference. Incidentally, the alleged Shi’ah and Sunni Aimmah of Iran deliberately altered and distorted the connotations of seventy-eighty thousand words, phrases and expressions of the last revelation of Allah, to destroy its bona fide message. Verses of the Qur’an led the authors to repudiate, the fictitious terminology they created through the debris literature of Ahadith, Sunnah, Traditions and Fiqah. What the Ummah has failed to notice for the last 1.4 millennium has been put forth in clear-cut terms for the entire world to perceive, utilizing the analytical approach with the guidance of the rational message of the Qur’an.
Origin of Aazan [Adhan], or call for prayer
A Bukahari’s Hadith recounts; when the Muslims migrated to Medina, they had a big problem at their hands, with the mode of assembling the people for prayers. They discussed the matter thoroughly among themselves, with a consensus building around the following couple of suggestions:
Ø Toll a bell like Christians. Ø Blow a trumpet, or a horn like Jews.
Mohammad rejected those proposals out right. However, he agreed with Umar’s idea right away; a man should go up on the roof of the mosque to call the people. He, immediately, asked Bilal to get up and go for the Aazan [Adhan]. [B1:334,577,578; B4:440,663; M1:207,735; ADI1:126,498]
The above Hadith does show selection of a procedure for calling the people for prayers, without giving any information about the most important aspects. Who composed the specific wording of Aazan, or set out the exact tone and timbre of articulating the composition out and loud. However, the expression Allah-O-Akbar, an essential and repetitive constituent of Aazan, and all prayers, does not exist in the Qur’an. In fact, the phrase Allah-O-Akbar, according to the Arabic grammar, is synonymous with insulting Him, because Allah is comparable to none.
Note: For getting additional details on the subject of Allah-O-Akbar, please look up the first publication of the authors, entitled, ‘The Qur’anic Concept of Nikah vs. Religious Prostitution.’
The Hadith quoted above pops up the following additional questions in the human mind:
Ø What is the authenticity of the above Hadith? How could Mohammad make the biggest blunder of his life by inserting Allah-O-Akbar in the Aazan, which Allah has not inscribed in the Qur’an even once, as it constitutes an affront to His persona? Ø Were the Muslims praying without Aazan in Mecca, before migrating to Medina? How they used to get together over there, without the call going out for it? Ø Five daily prayers were bestowed upon Mohammad during his tête-à-tête with Allah; why he did not get Aazan at the same time? Was it a gaffe on part of the latter? Ø According to another Hadith, the Prophet said, “I would send someone to deliver Aazan [call for prayer], then I would go from the back door and burn the houses of those men, who did not come to the mosque for Ishah [last ritual of the day] prayer.” [B1: 350, 617; B9: 250, 330] [Comment: This is a despicable Hadith, which is nothing except being an untruth, because it is not compatible with the excellent and humane persona of the last Messenger of Allah, presented by the Qur’an.]
Incidentally, Shi’ah sect has a different Aazan [Adhan] as compared to that of Sunni. Here a question pops up; which one is more in line with Allah’s commandments? For an instance, it is presumed both are OK. Then, it seems logical to assume, the mission of Mohammad was to divide the Ummah, before it was even formed. It is ridiculous to entertain such a notion, as in the time of Mohammad and his excellent associates; the sects did not exist. This abomination surfaced almost three centuries after his death, with the emergence of the alleged Aimmah in Iran, the most fertile land for conspiracies against Allah, Mohammad and the Qur’an.
Ahadith condemn Bilal as an apostate
The Qur’an directs; every Muslims must follow Mohammad‘s orders. It is cogently written in the last revelation of Allah; a person cannot be a Muslim, who dares to reject Mohammad’s command. Bilal exactly did that on couple of occasions according to the following Ahadith:
[Comments: Incidentally, Amen is not an Arabic word, which means the situation described by the author of the Hadith under reference, never happened. It is just another attempt to malign the excellent personal character of a close associate of Mohammad, who according to Allah was a bunch of noble and honorable people. Such Ahadith show, how venomous the Iranian writers were.]
According to the above Ahadith, Bilal was not a Muslim by definition, in the first place; here the question comes up; how could Mohammad ask such a person to do the Aazan [Adan]? The authors of Ahadith have more or less portrayed Mohammad, as a weakling, who lacked adequate control over his associates. That is a false notion from the viewpoint of the Qur’an. The Ahadith quoted above evidently prove, the matter of Aazan was brought up, neither by Allah, nor by Mohammad. However, this step was taken in the city of Medina, upon the suggestion of Umar. This means, the step, which was not taken directly by Allah through his Messenger, was approved upon the proposal of Umar. This point of view is not only ridiculous, but also an affront to Allah and Mohammad, which the authors of Ahadith used to express happily, especially, to degrade the position of the latter. The obvious conclusion of the above discussion is; Allah did not direct the Ummah, through His last Messenger, to invent any Aazan [call for prayer]. This practice originated in Iran, the only centre of conspiracies against the tenets of the Qur’an, centuries after the demise of Mohammad, and his faithful associates. It is outrageously disgraceful to realize, that the Muslim Ummah is still performing the alien ritual of Aazan, which the last Messenger of Allah, and his followers never adopted, over 1400 years ago. This despicable practice is still going on strong, because of the reason, it was authored by Allah forsaken Bukhari, Muslim and their malevolent contemporaries. It is utterly shameful to watch in the 21st century that the common Muslim [70-80%] is Qur’an illiterate. On top of that, the sham and fake literature of Ahadith and Sunnah is considered as authoritative as the Qur’an. The hate literature against, Allah, Mohammad and the Qur’an, comprising of Ahadith, Sunnah, Traditions, and Fiqah abundantly flourished under the patronage of illegitimate caliphs of the Abbasid dynasty, when the Iranian conspirators had a free hand to do whatever plagued their crooked imagination. The rulers, lusting for absolute power and unlimited riches, got the religious patronage of the ostensible Aimmah to have the whole lot their way. For this very reason, whatever was written in that period is fictitious, biased and worthless. It should be destroyed, as that is the only way to get rid of sectarianism in Islam, which according to the Qur’an is straightforward Shirk. Another peculiar Ahadith pertaining to Aazan, which is the basic tool of gathering the faithful for prayer, and is also shouted aloud in the right ear of the newly born, goes as under, without any editing:
‘Mohammad invited Al- Hassan by uttering a call of prayer [Aazan] in ear right after his birth.’ [AD3:2825, 5086] [Comment: Perhaps, it was the very first uprising in the Muslim history against the fallacious literature of Ahadith, when the first infant cried at the top of its lungs, which experienced the trauma of earsplitting Aazan. Why the Muslims go for this ritual, which, in fact, degrades the position of Allah?
Note: For further studies on the subject of Aazan, please get a copy of the first publication of the authors, entitled, ‘The Qur’anic Concept of Nikah [wedlock] vs. Religious prostitution.’
However, the Quran has condemned Shi’ah, Suni and all other Iranian brand of Aazans or orders and declares that the only order which exists in the Quran is the Aazan of Allah which takes you out from all kinds of darkness of the society [5:16]
‘Allah will guide those who wish to follow the His path of peace. It will cause complete hormany among them and bring them out from layers upon layers of darkness in to the radiance by His Aazan or order and guide them to the right and peaceful path.’
The Reality of Wudu
The Qur’an has employed the term Ghusal, and not Wudu [an Iranian word]. It simply means, for participating in, or conducting the official meetings called Sallat by the Qur’an, one should be presentable. It is logical to have a bath in the hot climate of Saudi Arabia, before attending any public assembly. However, in case of water shortage, or in the state of sickness, one should wash essential parts of the body, as per the directions of the Qur’an. The word Wudu, as already mentioned, is of Iranian origin, but the most interesting aspect is its mode of application. Shi’ah and Sunni sects follow varying routines. The former take a start from the feet, whereas the Sunni, begin with the face first. Can Allah give such an imprudent and contradictory command?
Tayammum and the Messenger of Allah
In case water is not available, then the second best option is to go for Tayammum. Some Ahadith are given below explaining, how to get on with it:
‘Narrated Ammar, the Prophet stroked lightly the earth with his hands and then blew off the dust and passed his hands over his face and the back of his hands.[while demonstrating Tayammum]’
‘Narrated Said bin Abbdur Rehman bin Abza on the authority of his father, who said: Ammar said so[ the above statement].And Shu’ba stroked lightly the earth with his hands and brought them close to his mouth (blew off the dust) and passed them over his face and then the backs of his hands. ‘Ammar said, “Ablution (meaning Tayammum here) is sufficient for a Muslim if water is not available.”
‘We were in a detachment and became Junub and I blew the dust off my hands (performed the rolling over the earth and prayed).”
Narrated Abu Juhaim Al-Ansari: The Prophet came from the direction of Bi’r Jamal. A man met him and greeted him. But he did not return back the greeting till he went to a (mud) wall and smeared his hands and his face with its dust (performed Tayammum) and then returned back the greeting. [B1:201,334,339; M1:202,716] [Comment: From the above Ahadith, it is evident, one has to take either of the following courses for performing Tayammum, to circumvent the unavailability of water:
Is it not a challenge to one’s sanity, to believe in the methods prescribed above for achieving cleanliness? Did Mohammad really adopt and follow such mucky procedure for tidying himself up? It is shameful to have faith in such filthy stories spread about Mohammad, the magnificent last Messenger of Allah. In order to discern the reality of Wudu, please go to the pertinent chapter on the subject!
Reciting out of the Qur’an Script before getting on with Praying
‘I seek refuge in Allah from Shaytan [Satan], the one evicted from the mercy of Allah.’
Incidentally, the above phrase is out of the Qur’an. In other words, it is NOT a part of the revelation. The Question is; who coined it and then introduced it into the alleged prayer routine? Does any verse of the Qur’an directs Muslims, to recite non-revealed Arabic write-ups during the prayers?
سبحا نك ا لهم ؤ بحمد ك ؤ تبا رك ا سمك ؤ تعا لى جد ك ؤ لا اله غير ك
The unedited usual translation of the clandestine expression [out of the Qur’an] given above, runs as under:
‘Glory to you, O Allah, and praise. Blessed is Your name and exalted Allah’s forefathers or Allah’s ancestors, and there is no God other than you.’
Are the Muslims, under the impression; Allah has His forefathers and really He needs such superfluous and laudatory extol for His genuine existential magnificence? If they earnestly think so, then they are the most dim-witted people on the face of the earth. According to the Arabic grammar, the word Jiddaka جد ك in the above sentence signifies the existence of Allah’s ancestors, which is against the concept of His solitary existence.
Basic Constituents of Prayers
This means, the prevalent prayers [collectively] are not an integral part of the constitution of the Qur’an, and play no role in the establishment of a government, in accordance with that document. Mohammad and his stalwart companions did not waste their valuable time for prayers, because Allah did not command them to do so, in the first place. This time-wasting ritual was invented way past their time, by the people, who hated Allah, Mohammad and the Qur’an. This subject has been dealt with at length in the book; please go through it with an open mind for your own benefit!
Now, here a question pops up; the companions of Mohammad, during his lifetime, used to perform Farad for Allah, but what did they used to do during Sunnat? Did Mohammad used to sit in front of them, when they were offering his part of the Nimaz, the Sunnat? Were they, by any chance, praying for him? Did Mohammad offer his own Sunnat? Does it not sound ridiculous? [Comment: Since the Farad component of the prayer is not mentioned in the Qur’an, it is for sure, Mohammad, the last Messenger of Allah, never performed it. All Messengers of Allah, without any exception, were under obligation to do, what they were expressly asked for, and omit the rest. The Iranian Nimaz falls under the last category and must be left out.]
[Comment: Allah provided Mohammad with a constitution to establish a government for solving the problems of the downtrodden masses, which had been continually ripped off by the rich and the powerful few, for centuries. What role could the Iranian Nimaz play in such a scenario? Incidentally, in the charter of any democratic country there is no room, for either the priesthood, or rituals.]
Note: In the very first chapter of the book, the connotations of Sallat and other relevant terms have been discussed in details from the viewpoint of the Qur’an.
[Comments; It may be all right to do so in a nudist club, because no one wears any clothes over there, and certainly, it is the most secluded spot in the entire area of its location. What do you think about going for supplication in such a turning on environment? Most probably, the devotees of Khalifa may not like to approach their God wearing the same garments, in which they had committed so many sins. The question comes to mind; does Khalifa Irashad’s God really want this kind of sexually electrifying get together for praying? However, Allah does not vouch for this kind of behavior, as it is against His code of ethics.]
[Comment: Allah categorically forbids the wastage of food resources. Killing millions of four-legged ruminating animals on Hajj is against the tenets of the Qur’an, as the prevalent pilgrimage of the common Muslims to Mecca is the worst misrepresentation of the last revelation of Allah. In fact, Hajj means a yearly General Assembly of the regional and international heads of states, to solve the pressing problems, in consonance with an agreed upon agenda, based upon the code of the Qur’an. [This topic has been thoroughly thrashed out in the relevant chapter of this presentation.]
[Comment: The Qur’an clearly explains; Surah Al-Fatiah is Allah’s constitution for the entire humanity. He commands its application for the creation of a real paradise in this world. No democratic nation on the face of the earth, besides Muslims, recites its constitution in any kind of a ritual. On the contrary, it is implemented in both letter and spirit.
First Surah of the Qur’an [Al-Fatihah] is not some kind
of a Dua, as a vast majority of Muslims believes. It is, in
fact Al- Kitaab It is interesting to note, all nouns of the seven verses constituting this Surah, are of aggregate nature. In simple terms, it means using plurals like ‘us’ and ‘we’ instead of ‘I’ and ‘me.’ A collective consciousness is running through the text, and the program outlined is for the benefit of the community, as opposed to that of an individual.]
[Comment: The Muslim Ummah rejects this injunction every day, as during the two prayers, namely Zohar and Assar, they remain silent like a tomb, but in other three submissions, Fajar, Mughrib and Isha, their loud speakers blare at full volume, disturbing the entire neighborhood. They continue doing this without any regard for the sick people and the students. The latter cannot concentrate on their studies during this period of public disturbance and nuisance. Allah’s code of ethics emphatically stresses upon the humans to be very conscious about the people’s right to nice and quiet living.]
[Comment: In the entire manuscript of the Qur’an, there is not even a single contradiction of commands and directives pertaining to any matter. It is the ‘religion Islam’, which has smashed the unifying message of Allah into smithereens, over the centuries. The adversaries of Mohammad, especially, from Iran, played the dirty double game with the Muslim Ummah, to destroy its unified strength, which disintegrated their empire, like a house of cards.]
[Comment: First, the cause of disagreement, ‘Ameen’ is not an Arabic word. The Jews and Christians were using this term in their prayers, before the advent of the Qur’an, which the Iranian Aimmah, the biggest conspirators in the history of Islam, copied to create another dissention among the disintegrated Muslims. The Sunni and Alah-e-Ahadith sects of the ‘religion Islam’ are at loggerheads for centuries, about this issue. They have failed to decide such a simple matter, whether to say ‘Ameen’ loudly or quietly, when the recital of Surah Al-Fatiah ends.]
[Comment: Ironically, the two of the most wicked and depraved authors of Ahadith and Sunnah have self-defeated or rather contradicted their above quoted Hadith by writing the one given below. Actually, they were generating so much filth in the name of Mohammad; they often forgot, what they had already written: “The first mosque built on the earth was Ka’bah, and the second was Masjid-al-Aqsa.” [Jewish national religious center] [B4: 383, 585, 422; M1: 264, 1056]
[Comment: Here a question arises; the earlier Messengers of Allah frequently utilized the same term Sallat, but were never invited to visit Allah’s pad, wherever it may be? Why did Allah maintain such a discriminatory attitude towards all of His previous Messengers? Could He do such a willful injustice to them all, as compared to Mohammad? However, whatever happened was not fair, as their nations made a clear escape from the stipulation of Sallat ritual, which, indeed, is nothing but Iranian Nimaz for the Muslims. Considering the purported incident of Mohammad’s Ascension, the following points are worth noting: Firstly, the Qur’an is silent about Mohammad’s extra-terrestrial adventure, and the verse 17:1, which the Muslim clergy quotes in support of this event, does not describe Mohammad’s ascension. Actually, it provides details about the exodus of Moses along with his nation form Egypt, going across the sea, in the cover of night, to a safe haven on earth. Secondly, why should Allah call Mohammad anywhere in the outer space or to the heaven [even if it really exists] when He proclaims, “His laws are fully operational everywhere, even in the far reaches of the cosmos?” Thirdly, when there is no mention of any prayers in the Qur’an, then why was Mohammad invited to visit with Allah and receive the gift of prayers. Conversely, if prayers were so much dear to Allah, why did the Qur’an not open with the commandments leading to them? Fourthly, the Qur’an specifically mentions in more than one verse, Allah is beyond the wildest human imagination, perception, and comprehension. Then how is it possible, Mohammad could have tête-à-tête with Him. A limited being, Mohammad, could never have any concept of the Unlimited Allah. Fifthly, the Muslim priesthood insulted Allah by limiting Him to a single spot, heaven. In fact, this is nothing more than a myth, which all religions of the world accept in one form or another. Actually, this event was taken right out of the Zoroastrian religious book, entitled, Arta Viraf Namak, which was in existence around four centuries, before the birth of Mohammad. The Muslim clergy rewrote the same story, with added attractions, like Gabriel and winged horse along with, surreptitiously, changing the main character; replacing the Iranian hero with Mohammad. For reading further juicy details of this fictitious event, please read the pertinent chapter of the book. Another important point worth mentioning is, if Mohammad started praying after the event of Ascension or the revelation of chapter 17, Bani Israel, then in what context did he understand the word Sallah, which appeared in 25 verses of the Qur’an before all that happened? The previous Messengers of Allah like Abraham, Moses Jesus, Ishmael, Lot, Isaac, Zachariah and Shuaib all confronted the term Sallat according to the verses, 10: 87; 14:40; 19:31; 19:55; 21:73; 3:39; 11:87 of the Qur’an. Did they all get involved with the ridiculous business of praying, or Allah let them go scot-free, without ordering some courses of supplications for them? It is well known they were lucky enough to get the second option.]
[Comment: Allah rightly differentiates between religion and Al –Deen, through the medium of the last revelation. Religion divides people into watertight compartments like parties, sects, factions and groups, whereas Al-Deen unites the entire humanity into a single large family unit.
[Comment: Did Bukhari personally watch Satan doing that in both ears simultaneously? Is it a male or a female? In case of Satan, being a male, it can happen, as he can easily align the hole of its organ to that of the ear. However, if it is a female, then it is out of the question. Naturally, the holes can never get in line and the urine will be spilled over, instead of flowing in. Unfortunately, human ear is not a water container; it is kind of a box to catch the sound waves hitting the eardrum. Another point worth watching; why Satan is so much crazy about the Morning Prayer?]
The Funeral Prayer
Bukhari, Tirmidhi and other Ahadith writers narrate; Mohammad used to offer funeral prayers. If the quotes of these people are right, then the question pops up; why the Quran does not issue any directive for this kind of swab [reward] earning practice? All Muslim sects, and the alleged literature of Ahadith [B2:228, CH] claim, Sallat or prayer, without Qayyam, Rakooh and Sajood is incomplete, but all of them, without any exception, execute funeral prayers [supplication not recommended by the Qur’an] without those essential components. What a contradiction on part of the Muslim priesthood, followers of the Iranian Aimmah, who originated such rituals, in the first place. The following Hadith commands women not to accompany funeral processions, and stay away from cemeteries.
‘Women are forbidden to accompany the funeral processions.’ [B1: 185, 310; AD1: 294, 1135] [Comment: This Hadith shows Allah has a racist attitude towards women. How could Mohammad issue such a xenophobic statement, despite Allah’s clear injunction? ‘Every human being [irrespective of gender, race, color, nationality and language] is equally honorable in accordance with Allah’s Law of Justice!’ In which verse or, verses of the Qur’an, the subject of funeral prayers has been specifically, dealt with? Supposedly, if this Hadith is considered accurate, and it is accepted, Mohammad used to lead funeral prayers; it is going to open another Pandora’s Box. Obviously, the question arises, how Mohammad could dare to conduct funeral prayers for the deceased, when Allah has not given any particular directive in the Qur’an for him to do so. However, the Qur’an does advise humans to bury their dead six feet deep in the ground, for the following reasons:
Eulogizing Mohammad
For the last millennium, the Muslims have been doing nothing, except ridiculously praising and worshipping the remains of Mohammad, buried in Medina, in the following ways:
Ø They sing Darood-o-Salam for Mohammad, in the form of Muslim choirs in mosques, using loud speakers, after morning, evening, and Friday prayers. Ø They unnecessarily extol Mohammad, members of his pseudo-family, namely, Ali, Fatima [a non-Arabic name], her two sons, along with Abraham and his family
Note: Bukhari presents a variety of Darood-o-Salam, for the benefit of Sunni and Shi’ah sects.
A question pops up here, who invented anecdotal eulogies for the last Messenger of Allah, and who authorized various Muslim sects to conduct such ridiculous religious activities? As already mentioned above, Darood is a Persian word. Was it possible for Allah to direct Mohammad, for forwarding Darood-o-Salam unto Him in the Persian language, when He revealed the Qur’an to him, in Arabic? It does not make any sense at all; does it? The Persian or the modern Iranian word Darood denotes, to cut up any material into pieces. Does this mean; Allah commands the Muslims, through a directive given in Persian language, to rip the constitution of the Qur’an into thin ribbons, by indulging in such useless practices? However, the Qur’an declares, there is no point in wasting valuable time for such worthless activities. One can call upon the carcasses, as much as one wants, including that of Mohammad, but there shall never be any answer coming, as the dead lose the faculty of responding, which is only the prerogative of the living. [35:14]
‘They can never hear your calls, and even if they could do so, they cannot answer your prayers.’
The only people capable of responding to your requests are the ones, who possess the auditory faculty. [6:36]
‘Only those people can respond, whose acoustic equipment and systems are fine tuned, and the dead bodies are totally devoid of them.’
The ones buried six feet under, cannot perceive any Darood-o-Salam. Actually, the straightforward message of the Qur’an is a sure and certain death for the frivolous pursuits like Darood-o-Salam and a score of others, which are prevalent in the Muslim societies, all over the world. The religious vultures, which do nothing else, except using the name of Allah and Mohammad, for collecting money in the form of alms, donations and charity, would have their survival in jeopardy, without carrying on all of those activities. These alleged custodians of the Qur’an are, in fact, the worst enemies of its magnificent and spectacular message, which can change the destiny of the entire human race. For them the most challenging question is what they would do, if the Ummah ever comes to its senses and rejects their interpretation of the Qur’an.
Beating Rosary Beads to Extol Allah and Mohammad
Buddhist monks, Hindu hermits [Sadhus], Zoroastrian priests, Jewish rabbis, Christian popes, and Muslim clerics regularly beat the beads of rosaries in order to evoke God, or their personal gods. Here, a question arises, does God, or the demigods, have ever asked them to indulge in such a pointless practice? The common people remember only those loved ones, who either pass away, or are separated from them by moving to other places, within the same country, and the ones migrating to far away lands. Allah, as such, shall never taste death. He is not only all pervading, but ubiquitous through His immutable laws, which have the entire cosmos under their control. Then what is the need to remember Allah or God, along with keeping a record of that dumb act, by counting the rosary beads. Incidentally, the agnostic Buddha invented a string of beads, called Mala in India, and rosary in Europe. Incidentally, the following comments of a couple of eminent scientists, about atheism and atheists, are very interesting:
All theistic religions of the world should be thankful to the agnostic and idiotic Buddha, who made such a useless innovation, which became a roaring success among the people, which closely resemble the lotuseaters. The rosary bead beaters are the biggest time wasters of the world, and if a competition were introduced in this category in the Olympic Games, they would win easily. The fact remains Buddha was a defeated person to begin with. Instead of changing the environment of the court and the cruel system in practice, he ran away from the troubled spot in search of personal nirvana. What did he do for the common people, which were under the rule of the iron fist, and were surviving in sub-human environment? He did nothing for them at all, and escaped from there, leaving his young wife and child behind; because he was the most despicable coward, human history has ever known. The dynamic and full of life program of Allah is an antithesis of Buddha’s philosophy of lethargy and inactivity. None, with sane head on one’s shoulders can appreciate the practice invented by the one, who was a yellow-belly to begin with. The Muslims that follow Buddha’s way of life are committing a criminal offence against the code of the Qur’an.
Aashurah عا شو را Celebration
In the Vatican City, the Christians pull out the procession of Virgin Mary, every Sunday, in the memory of the fake event of crucifiction of Jesus. Similarly, some people belonging to certain Christian sects in Brazil and Philippines punish themselves by putting nails in their hands on the cross, in order to pay tribute to the sacrifice of Jesus. The Iranian Aimmah borrowed that concept from Christianity, and started taking out mourning processions since 352 Higra [on the command of a Muslim king, Muiz-zud-Doulah Vailami], to commemorate fictitious martyrs of a fabricated event that supposedly happened at Karbala [a city of modern Iraq] in 62 Higra. Additionally, they called upon the followers of their sect to remember Ali with the title ‘Lion of God’ [Shair-e–Khuda], which they collectively bestowed upon him, because in their view, God does require the services of a lion to control this world. Factually, the Shi’ah copied this mythological concept from the Assyrian, Babylonian, Zoroastrian, Aryan and Christian cultures, which venerated lion as a symbol of power, authority and dominance. Some of their demigod statues carried head of a lion, on a human body. In Pakistan, the Habib Bank, which belongs to the Shi'ah community, has its logo engraved upon the front entrance of every branch, which represents Ali in the form of a lion god. Here follows the historical legacy of lion god, which many human civilizations revered and worshipped, before the Shi’ah Aimmah stole it, and called it their own, by casting Ali in that befitting role:
Lion-god Worship through History
The Iranian Aimmah bestowed upon Ali numerous other titles, in their own language, to differentiate him from minor lion gods of other nations. They wanted to make him special for their own people, and more powerful as compared to the rest of gods. A few of these are as under:
The Babylonian calendar had the twelve months named after their animal gods and deities. The Shi'ah priesthood straightforwardly stole that concept and created the myth of twelve Aimmah. Of course, the head of this pack is حيد ر كر ا ر, the big lion. However, it has yet to be decided to which animal categories the rest of the eleven belong, Or may be, which species they would best represent. The Babylonian civilization developed and reached its zenith in the land lying between the two rivers, Tigris and Euphrates, which is now a part of modern Iraq. Following were the main features of Babylonian civilization.
"The worst Babylonian custom is that which compels every woman of the land once in her life to sit in the temple of love and have... intercourse with some stranger... the men pass and make their choice." Imam Baqar and other lecherous Shi’ah religious priests copied the evil idea of ‘blessed’ Mut’ah [temporary marriage] from Babylonian civilization for their cult.
The Hindu concept of fire worship or Agni Pooja is a sacred relic coming down from the Mesopotamian civilization. Its best manifestation occurs at the time of Deewali, or Deepawali, through ample lighting. People have a good time by drinking, gambling, and enjoying fireworks. A Hindu marriage is only recognized, when the marrying couple goes around the burning fire, called Pawiter Agni [pure fire], seven times. The Muslims also revere and remember the tradition established by Nimrod. They celebrate the festival of Shab-e-Barrat [the night of luck] by lighting up their homes, and practice many rituals, which has got nothing to do with Al-Deen. The Jews follow the tradition of Nimrod through the Candle Light Vigils, and the Christians do so by arranging tremendous illumination of their homes for almost three weeks at the time of Christmas.
According to the Islamic history, Ali had many children from his numerous wives, but the Zoroastrian Ahadith writers added two fictitious names, Hassan and Hussain to that list, for establishing the worst kind of personality cult among the Shi’ah sect of Islam, which the Qur’an rejects in the first place.
Hassan
Most of the Shi’ah historians are of the view; he was the eldest son of Ali, who married ninety-nine women during his short life span. However, Mullah Baqar Majleesi quoted in his book, entitled, Jillah Maloon [published in 1334 Higra from Tehran, Iran] that the number was much more higher, around two to three hundred. It is reported, that he died due to extreme debility he suffered, because of excessive sexual intercourse, be carried out with his so many wives. He had a strange way of proposing to a woman, he set his heart on to marry. The marriage proposal was always accompanied by a matching gift for would be bride. One hundred maidservants used to carry one thousand Dirham each, totaling D100, 000.00 [equivalent to $30,000.00 USD], to the girl’s house just as a token of respect for asking her hand in marriage. Though, Hassan used to receive large sums of money from Ameer Muawia off and on, yet he initially received five million Dirham, when he signed a peace treaty with him declaring himself out of the race for Khilafat [the throne]. No one knows the reason, but almost all historians have mentioned that at the time of his death, all his wives rushed to him bare feet and also did the same at the time of his funeral. It is imperative to check the authenticity of the above account using the yardstick of the Qur’an. According to the tenets of last revelation, monogamy is the basic rule, and men are supposed to follow it under normal circumstances. However, in an emergent situation, which drastically reduces the number of available men compared to that of the women, the Qur’an allows polygamy for a specified period. In modern times, this happened during the eight-year long Iran – Iraq war, causing two million casualties on both sides. In such a state of affairs, polygamy could be allowed, to absorb the extra number of unattached women, until such time, the situation normalized. Once that happened, the polygamy could be ruled out, re-establishing monogamy. It is a very simple concept to understand and the Qur’an precisely explains the same in the verse 4:3, given below:
‘If there ever arises a serious problem, endangering security and prosperity of your society, because of a large number of unprotected marriageable women [due to war or any other reason] along with orphans, then the Rule of Monogamy may be suspended for the duration of the emergency, by the established Muslim government! You may advise your companions to marry two, three, or four women of your liking.’
The above verse contains certain phrases, which require further explanation to understand the given command fully. In addition, some other aspects need detailed discussion for better comprehension. The pertinent points considered are enumerated below:
When there is no crisis, there are no widows or orphans to be taken care of; in that case follow the rule of monogamy for a stable and harmonious life!’
Men and women working for the establishment of a peaceful society, under the command of Mohammad, you must give preference to others as compared to yourselves, though you might have to endure personal hardships going that way! Under the normal conditions, follow the right path with one wife!’
In simple words, it means that if you cannot do justice to all concerned or are incapable of taking an additional responsibility on your shoulders, then stay away from it.
Sometimes, a person is already supporting a large family; his income is limited and is not sufficient to look after the day-to-day needs of his family members properly. He finds it difficult, with the available funds, to feed and clothe them and provide essential necessities of life. Such a situation makes his life miserable and extra tension puts him in a state of depression. He often cries alone and feels awful about his weak financial position. If you think the above situation can arise in your case by taking a second wife, it will then be advisable and even better for you to forget about it and stay contented with your current one.
This reduces such women to the status of unpaid common whores, who sleep around in accordance with the wish and whim of their owners.
Such debauched and depraved treatment of women is totally against the
injunctions of the Qur’an. Literally, Ma malakat aimanukum Therefore, if you are unable to maintain a large family properly, then you should stay put, with your wife either from your family/tribe or with the one who was a slave girl before the establishment of the Islamic state, but is now legally married to you under the Islamic Law.
Thus, Ma malakat aimanukum The caliphs of the past and the contemporary kings, princes, their courtiers, powerful clerics and other rich Muslims have had taken advantage of the misinterpretation of the quoted verse of the Qur’an to the fullest extent. The previous and the modern harems in the Muslim countries are a direct result of the deceptive explanation of a straightforward ruling of the Qur’an, addressing a situation that existed in the pre-Islamic era.
Secondly, the term Ma malakat aimanukum
Thirdly, Ma malakat aimanukum
Undoubtedly, exceptional situations require exceptional measures; that kind of a situation arose during wars, with the migration of a large number of women along with their orphaned children to the Islamic capital, Medina. There were three main feeders for this exodus:
In view of above the verse, it is permissible to marry more than one female, only in an emergent situation, to reduce the number of marriageable women in a particular Muslim society. However, it is not the decision of an individual, when to turn polygamist and have more than one wife. The Islamic government has the authority to make a declaration in this regard, specifying when this practice starts, how long the special permission stays enforced, and when it ends. All historians have a consensus that during the time of Hassan, the government had not declared any emergency for invoking the Law of Polygamy. Moreover, even under that situation, the Qur’an limits maximum number of wives a Muslim male can have simultaneously to four, and no more. Here a question pops up, how Hassan could marry two to three hundred women during his short life span, when according to the Qur’an, he could not have more than four at one time? Did he not care even a bit about the last revelation of Allah, and its specific commandments, his maternal grandpa received? Was he a real sex fiend, who just used feminine flesh to satisfy his super libido, and then threw it away like a rag doll? Did he suffer from a condition called satyriasis, or morbid lasciviousness? Whatever, the case may be, the Islamic history paints him as a genuine Casanova of antiquity. However, in view of the above verse, and the tainted image of Hassan presented by the Muslim historians, the following three possibilities can occur:
1) If Hassan really married and divorced two to three hundred women for the sake of his personal sexual gratification, then he defied the Qur’an, and totally ignored its laws pertaining to matrimony. He committed a grave crime punishable by the Islamic government. 2) If he did not do anything of the sort, then the complete Islamic history is nothing, but a pile of junk. 3) If the Islamic history is a fake document, then Hassan did not exist, and whatever the historians have written about him is not true.
HUSSAIN
The research conducted by Dr. Shabeer Ahmad, and presented in his publication entitled, Dastan-e-Karbala shows that Husain did not die as per the legend created by the Iranian historians. The Iranian conspirators, lead by Hurmazan, murdered him in the bedroom of the governor’s official residence in Koofa, the office he had inherited, upon the death of his elder brother Hassan. This means the much lamented events of Aashurah [first to tenth of Muharram, 62 Higra] portrayed by Tibri, in the first history book of Islam, on the evidence of Abu Makhnaf Loot bin Yahya, who appeared a century later, is nothing but pure and unadulterated fiction. The Iranian conspirators used Hussain as a puppet of convenience, to drive a wedge of hatred in the heart of the Muslim Ummah, with the added advantage of gaining the sympathy of illiterate followers of Mohammad. Similarly, the research work conducted by Mahmood Ahmad Abbasi, which appeared in the form of a book entitled, Khlafat-e-Muawia-o-Yazeed [Ed. 1962] also proved that the mythological event of Karbala, narrated by Shi’ah historians, never happened. Allama Aslam Jaipuri has discussed in detail, the murder of Hussain, in his historical presentation known as, Tariekh-ul Ummat. According to his research, this incident occurred around 62 or 64 Higra. However, the yearly commemorative procession started during the reign of Abbasid Caliph, Moiz-ud-Doula Vailmi, who issued a royal decree in 352 Higra [almost three centuries later] to that effect. According to the official declaration, the first ten days of every Moharram were earmarked for remembering the martyrdom of Hussain, his relatives and friends in Karbala, along with laying down the procedure to be followed strictly on the tenth day, called Aashura [the day of lamenting]. On that day, all markets would remain closed and men would beat their chests in groups moving along with the procession. Women shall also join in, but they shall remain at the tail end. They shall wail and cry aloud, beating their heads and chests, with their hair hanging loose. The local Sunni population considered this newly introduced ritual offensive, and being against the tenets of the Qur’an, vehemently opposed it. The ruling caliph became aggressive in response and demanded full compliance with his royal decree. Additionally, he ordered the Sunni population to celebrate 18 Zilhaj, as the day of mourning for the martyrs of Karbala. In face of an untoward reaction from his unified Sunni subjects, he went berserk and crossed all limits of decency. On his direct order, Tabarra [nastily insulting the dearest companions of Mohammad] posters were pasted on the inner, as well as outer walls of the Sunni mosques. That was the limit, and the Sunnis finally decided to get out of Baghdad, and settle in far flung cities. Incidentally, the Shi'ah sect expresses exceptional honor and gratitude, even in the 21st century, for the person, who murdered Umar-e-Farooq, the second caliph, as per their perverted and besmirched history. Though his given name was Feroz, yet the Shi'ah community honored him with the title of Abu L’u-L’u [dad of diamond] for his meritorious service of killing the closest friend of Mohammad, according to their profusely corrupted annals. He lies buried in a mausoleum recognized as that of Baba L’u- L’u, situated in the city of Qum, and is considered much more venerable as compared to those of Najaf and Karbala. The Shi'ah come visiting that shrine from all over the world, and pay rich tribute to him, by buying and wearing silver rings studded with cheap beryl [Aluminum Silicate] type gemstone called Feroza, named after him. Almost every Shi'ah wears the Feroza ring as a tribute to Abu L’u-L’u, and simultaneously cursing, or hurling Tabarra, primarily, upon Umar, and all others noble and stalwart companions of Mohammad. The supposed episode of Karbala occurred in 62 Higra, and the commemorative procession of Aashura began almost three centuries later, that even upon the decree of a caliph. Does it not sound odd? The straight and simple logic demands that if something of that magnitude did happen, the people should have started the memorial proceedings right away. They did not have to wait three hundred years for a caliph to come along, and make a beginning, utilizing his powers and authority. In fact, he started something, people did not consider worth their while, to waste their time. Many modern historians are of the view that nothing of the sort did actually happen. Hussain was a close relative of the caliph Yazid, and did willingly accept his position and authority in the centre. For that reason, he, following the footsteps of his father Ali, and elder brother Hassan, inherited the coveted post of Kufa’s governor. The phony account of his martyrdom surfaced over two centuries later, when the Iranian influence reached its pinnacle in the Abbasid court and harem. The name Hussain qualifies a person, who makes up his mind regarding any matter, after giving it a serious thought, utilizing his innate wisdom and sense of reasoning. If there really did exist any Hussain, claiming to be the grandson of Mohammad, then how could he take the following illogical decisions for the ‘cause of his Islam.’ which purportedly resulted in the devastation of his family?
· Why did he not move over to a safe haven, like Mohammad, his alleged maternal grandpa, when he felt threatened in his hometown? Incidentally, all Messengers of Allah followed that path, when they felt insecure in their places of birth. Why did he not consider this option in the first place? · If he had no other choice but to fight, then he should have raised an army properly equipped for a final showdown with his adversaries. · He should have moved away from his adversary’s stronghold, instead of moving towards it. There, he made the biggest blunder of his life, which cost him not only his life, but that of his close relatives and friends. · He should have left women and children behind, instead of taking them along into the battlefield. Every military general would say that was the most stupid move on his part, which he adopted in face of a better equipped and battle hardened regular army. · According to the Shi’ah historians, Hussain left Mecca on the ninth of Zil-Haj, a day before the ritual of Hajj. What was the hurry to get out of the city of his ancestors, where he could be much safer, and move towards the battlefield, without proper preparation? However, this decision of his part was against Allah’s command of Jihad. · Abraham, Moses, and Jesus slipped away in the darkness of night from their respective places of birth, when they realized they were not strong enough to take the enemy head on. He should have followed the same procedure for the safety and security of all concerned. It was stupid on his part to pick up a fight, with much superior enemy forces. · Lastly, Mohammad also left his birthplace in order to avoid unnecessary mayhem, practiced the same principle a day before the battle of Badar, when he did not allow his ill-equipped loyal fighters to march on to the battlefield. He did not want to waste their lives unnecessarily, when they lacked funds to procure proper arms and ride essential for joining the fight. [9:92]
‘The people, who approached you for arranging mounts for them, so that they could join your forces in the upcoming battle, are not to be blamed for anything, since you told them, “I am sorry; I cannot provide anything for you to ride on, right on.” They went away with eyes brimming with tears, and grief in their hearts, as they lacked the funds to equip themselves with the requisites of warfare, and fight on your side for the just cause.’
The above verse clearly shows it was commendable on the part of Mohammad, to stop people from going into the battlefield, who were not fully prepared for it, though his army was short of men and earnestly required additional hands. All Messengers of Allah followed the policy of avoiding unnecessary bloodshed as far possible, and for that very reason they always fought defensive, but decisive battles. However, when the fighting became inevitable, they went for it with adequate preparation and full force on their part. In the case of Hussain, it is obvious he did not prepare for the upcoming clash with the enemy forces, which he knew was inexorable. That was his biggest mistake as a general. Mohammad, his grandpa, is recognized as one of the best generals of all time, who always fought under duress, in the sense that as a last resort, he went to the battlefield. However, when he went for it, he made proper arrangements to ensure sure shot victory, with a minimum loss of life on his side. As his grandson, which the Shi’ah claims him to be; he failed to do anything right from a general’s perspective, and had the sole responsibility for all casualties on his side. He committed a criminal act, as per the directives of the Qur’an, pertaining to warfare, and received punishment for that by losing his own life, along with many of his relatives and friends. There is another side of this story. Mohammad did not have a daughter bearing a non-Arabic name, Fatima. Iranian conspirators made the biggest blunder by giving her an Iranian identity. Ali also seems to be a fictitious character created by the Iranian Aimmah for producing rift within the unified Muslim Ummah. They did need some one directly related to Mohammad, for making a claim to the caliphate, though most of the closest associates of the last Messenger of Allah were not his relatives. The constitution of the Qur’an does not attach any preference to the blood relations, though in a tribal environment it carried much importance. However, the Shi’ah conspirators of Iran did eventually play the close relative card for overthrowing the Umayyad caliphate. That is why they created the fictitious character of Ali; got him married to the non-existing daughter of Mohammad, and brought Hassan and Hussain into the world out of that union. Here a question comes to mind; Mohammad had other daughters, whom Shi’ah do not attach any importance at all. What is the reason for that? What was so special about invented Fatima that she and her family constituted Mohammad’s Ahl-e-Bait and Ale-e-Rasool, whereas his real and direct female descendants and their families find no such prominence in his life? The answer is very simple and straightforward; the matrimonial bond of Ali [the alleged son of Abu Talib, the real paternal uncle of Mohammad], and Fatima strengthened the clan of Banu Hashim, and legitimized the claim of the former as the successor to the caliphate, on the death of his father-in-law. That link placed a very powerful trump card in the hands of the Iranian conspirators, who triumphantly used it first to create differences, among Ali and other soul mates of Mohammad, and then during the tussle to uproot the Umayyad, they used it very effectively in the name of Ali and his progeny. Most of the Shi’ah historians have a consensus that almost all revolts and rebellions against the Umayyad rule originated from Iran, and the perpetrators always fought proxy battles on behalf of Ali and his descendants, the rightful owners of caliphate, being the nearest relatives of Mohammad. Ironically, when the Umayyad finally lost power after a continued struggle of one century against them, the beneficiaries were not Alvis [belonging to Ali or his family], but Banu Abbas another clan of Banu Hashim. The badly beaten and pushed out of power Alvi clan was perhaps the most disgruntled and disappointed group of people on the face of the earth at that point in time, because their century old efforts resulted in an utter failure to replace the Umayyad dynasty with their own. Abbasid, on the other hand got into the limelight, by becoming the rulers, whereas Alvis descended into the deep shadows of failure. Despite their total capitulation at the hands of their very distant cousins, the Alvis did not give up hope. They set up their shop in an entirely different area, by inventing the strange, but to some extent a novel idea, that the realm of spiritualism is much more extensive, as compared to the worldly caliphate. They claimed their ancestor Ali was the first and greatest of all Aimmah, who in certain respects was much more charismatic, and even powerful as compared to his first cousin Mohammad, the last messenger of Allah. That was the beginning of mysticism doctrine in Islam, which the Qur’an does not endorse at all, because it clearly depicts a defeated mentality. The Shi’ah Aimmah, twelve in all, came out of that intellectual bankruptcy. Nevertheless, it is really mind blowing, why they put a stop to their own production at the allegedly ‘sacred’ number twelve. If that had not happened, by now they might have run into a few dozens, if not hundreds. Anyways, twelve-Imam Shi’ah dogma restricts the real Imamat to Ali, his sons Hassan and Hussain, and nine direct linear descendants of the latter. Additionally, this doctrine presents these Aimmah as infallible intermediaries between humans and God. The continuous presence of Imam being a prerequisite for human salvation, Al-Mahdi, the last Imam, supposedly, is existing in a state of mysterious suspended animation [away from prying eyes] since 874 A.D., only to emerge near the apocalyptic end of the world, in the form of a messiah. The above mythological narrative is miserably out of place with the most modern human thinking. In the 21st century, people know, no one can possibly live for over eleven centuries, hidden away somewhere, because the average life span in that era was forty years. The reasonable explanation might be; he must have died incognito a few years after his disappearance at the age of five. The investigative agencies of the Western world would have classified him as a missing child. They would theorize, in view of their vast experience in that particular area of expertise, that a hard-boiled pedophile-cum-pederast kidnapped him, at that tender age; sodomized him to his heart’s content, and then got rid of him to find another bedfellow. The fundamental tenet of Shi’ah religion is extreme hatred for all honorable and venerated companions of Mohammad, except Ali. Nevertheless, the facts prove beyond any doubt, they remained committed to the cause of Islam, and made continuous collective efforts, until the establishment of the very first Muslim government, based on the constitution of the Qur’an, in Medina. The sacrifices they made, personally, as well as jointly, for the collectively cause, under the leadership of Mohammad, are worth writing in gold. Ali, being a minor, or most probably a non-existent entity, did not participate in that struggle at all. Undoubtedly, the associates of Mohammad, not only respected one another, but also felt a deep love for each other. The Qur’an provides overwhelming proof of that reality in the verse 48:29, presented below:
‘Mohammad is the Messenger of Allah, and his friends feel affection for one another [as a mother does for her children], because of sharing and supporting the tenets of the Qur’an. They are firm, steadfast and mighty like a solid piece of rock, for those who try to conceal or oppose the commandments of the Qur’an.’
In view of the above verse, all associates of Mohammad were decent, respectable, and selfless people, who turned into a unified force under his brilliant command. Undoubtedly, they had great regard for one another, and constituted the first family of Muslims. The Qur’an speaks very highly of them, and commends their continued efforts, which resulted in the implementation of the constitution, the last revelation of Allah presents for the benefit of the entire humanity. Anyways, those men and women passed away almost thirteen centuries ago. They did very well in their time, but now they are simply a part of history. Nothing good can come out by remembering them, because they are dead and gone. Allah complimented all of them for their righteous deeds and the Qur’an testifies to that effect. There is nothing big about them now, because they went six feet under and are going to stay there until the end of time. The Qur’an openly declares, the people of any era would never be questioned what their predecessors, or ancestors did. Every generation is strictly responsible for its activities, whether good or bad. What happened between Ali, which, in fact, is a fictitious character fabricated by the Shi’ah Aimmah of Iran, and other companions of Mohammad, has got nothing to do with the Muslims of modern times. Let bygones be bygones, and bury the history, especially, the one based on false and phony accounts, because it is not going to do any good to any one, except the belligerent sectarian Mullahs, which thrive on the warring factions. with rolling in donations. The equation is very simple; violence is directly proportional to generated funds. The supper structure of Shi’ah religion rests upon two fundamental principles. The first one is the vast stinking dump of self-created myths in the form of Ahadith, Sunnah not only of Mohammad, but also that of Ali and his descendants, whereas the second one is the personality cult, or rather celebrity worship. However, the Qur’an out rightly condemns the both, because Allah did not appoint Mohammad as his last Messenger, to teach and lead the Zoroastrian Nimaz, or perpetually mourn the dead, but to form a government by implementing the constitution of the Qur’an, and to show humanity, how to enjoy peace, progress, and prosperity, along with security. The modern Shi’ah priesthood, especially in Iran, the only Shi’ah majority country in the world, has no concept what kind of constitution, and the charter of rights and obligations, along with civil and penal codes the Qur’an presents, and how much people friendly this system is. The current governments established at all levels, such as central, provincial and municipal, are neither democratic nor Islamic. In fact, everywhere there exist an awful combination of dictatorship and elements of democracy. The Supreme Leader of Iran, of course a Grand Ayatollah, who remains in power until death, is responsible for the delineation and supervision of "the general policies of the Islamic Republic." He is the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, controls the military intelligence and security operations; and has the only power to declare war. The Supreme Leader appoints the heads of judiciary, state radio, television networks, the commanders of police and military forces, and six out of the twelve members of the Council of Guardians. Since the establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran, there have only been two Supreme Leaders; Ruhollah Khomeini, 1979–1989, and Ali Khamenei, 1989 – continuing on. The Assembly of Experts elects and dismisses the Supreme Leader on basis of qualifications and popular esteem—no one has seen dismissal so far. The Assembly of Experts is responsible for supervising the Supreme Leader in the performance of legal duties. However, that is just hogwash, as the person under reference is too powerful for any individual or organization to take up head on. This is plain and simple dictatorship strengthened and augmented with the authority of religion. The elected president of Iran is, in fact, a miserable wretch, who simply runs errands and carries out commands of the Supremo, though he receives a mandate from the masses at the time of election. He is in servitude to a religious dictator, which the sociologists consider to be of the most horrific kind. A vast majority of illiterate people remains apprehensive about it, and never ever dare to oppose it. They did revolt against the Shah, but would never dare to turn against the Grandiose, because this time they would be committing a grave sin, punishable in hell. The ‘opium of religion’ would do the trick and keep them in check. There is a strong undercurrent gaining strength, especially, among the literate Iranians, that the country’s over all economic situation was much better during the reign of the Shah, which was toppled by the religious frenzy of the common people, instigated and accentuated manifold by the religious mafia of Ruhollah Khomeini and his cohorts. The alleged religious revolution of Iran has let the people down and has made their life miserable. It has been a total failure on the economic front, which the ostensible leaders of the revolution did stress upon the most, as the main premise. Now, 40/50% university graduates cannot find jobs, in the land, which used to be a thriving industrial and commercial market, where skilled people from the sub-continent used to come looking for all sorts of jobs. The Supremo and his allied Mullahs lack the vision of turning the oil rich country into an industrial giant. It is bad luck of the Iranians that their leaders lack knowledge, aptitude, and the requisite expertise for industrializing the country. The Mullah Hegemony is corrupt to the core, and cares a damn for their citizens. However, they have made them very happy by giving them unbridled sexual freedom, through the institution of Mut’ah. The unemployed young men and women, who cannot get married due to financial problems, take out their frustration through temporary marriage, due to which teen pregnancy has increased by whopping 70%, within the last five to ten years. Incidentally, now, in Iran, 60% of the total population standing at 145 million is under 25.
Eid-e-Meelaad-un-Nabi
Muzafar-ud-Deen Kokari, Bin-Arbal, a nonreligious ruler, was the founder of the pageant, now recognized as the Eid-e-Meelaad–un-Nabi parade, taken out on the main thoroughfares of various metropolitan cities of many Muslim countries. To celebrate this joyful event with real pomp and show, he ordered various professional dancing troupes to accompany the procession for the pleasure of the spectators. On the floats, special singing groups were seated, excessively eulogizing Mohammad, by singing Qawwalis [devotional vocal presentations], profusely exaggerating the achievements, he made during his lifetime. Then there were special choirs [without musical accompaniment], which praised Mohammad to the skies, giving an impression of his god incarnated, superhuman powers, and achievements. Muzafar-ud-Deen’s friend, Molavi Umair –Bin- Wahyya-ul- Khattab, an eminent jurist of his time, but a very self-centered character, was the biggest inspiration for him to start that kind of worthless and against the tenets of the Qur’an extravaganza. Incidentally, he was one the most notorious fabricators of Ahadith. Both of them initiated, popularized, and established that ritual during 604 Higra in the city of Mosol, of the modern Iraq.
Ø King Muzafar-ul-Deen Kokari, Bin-Arbal was a spendthrift extraordinaire. He ordered the Mullahs on his pay role, to invent new rituals for making the religion more colorful, as compared to its drab outlook at that moment. However, it is interested to note, that personally, he was an atheist.[Alqool-Al-Mothad, Meellaads, P. 22] Ø He was the first Muslim ruler in the Muslim history, who introduced that kind of extraneous activities, which the Qur’an forbids. His favorite pastime was that on the eve of Eid-e-Meelaad-un-Nabi, he used to gather his chosen musicians, singers, and dancers to dance on the most popular rhythmic compositions. [Fatawa Rasheedia, P.132] Ø Mr. Sabbat-Bin-Jotri in his publication, History Mirrat-uz-Zama presents the following details of his extravagant expenditure on the eve of Eid-e-Meelaad-un-Nabi:
On the eve of Eid-e-Meelaad-un-Nabi, king Muzafar-ul-Deen Kokari, Bin- Arbal had a standing order to slaughter 5,000 lambs, 10,000 chicken, 100 horses, and prepare 30,000 plates of Halwah [a sweet dish prepared from wheat lets , sugar, and oil] for dinner. Muslim mystics called Sufis were invited to such a sumptuous feast, who continued singing and dancing up to the wee hours in the morning.
Note: Here it must be born in mind that horse is a non-ruminating animal and Muslims are forbidden to consume it as such. This Muzafar-ul-Deen Kokari, Bin- Arbal was a strange character, who made his Muslim invitees eat horsemeat.
There is a well-known saying, ‘monkey see, monkey do.’ This adage adequately applies to the Muslims, who copied many Jewish, and Christian rituals cum relics, and ‘Islamized’ them, in a way to look as their own. A pertinent example is required here to hammer the point right home. The Jews declared Sabbath as a ‘holy day’ and holiday, which in simple terms means, God got tired after the creation of the universe, and was resting in the lap of deep slumber, without sedation. However, the Jewish priesthood stayed wide-awake and was actively engaged in religious, taking full advantage of His absence. They were out collecting donations in His name from their followers, including rich as well as poor. Jewish Rabbis are still following their ‘rich’ tradition and do not let any Saturday go bye without doing their good ‘godly’ work of collecting funds in the name of their God. The Christians imitated the Jews and the Pope announced Sunday as a Holy Day or holiday throughout the Christendom. The basic tenet was the same, to fleece the repentant sheep thoroughly with the promise of the Lord’s forgiveness. How could the Muslim clergy be such a stupid bunch to let this heavenly chance pass bye, without taking full advantage of it? They picked up Friday as their Holy Day, or Allah’s day off. On that day, they use every trick of their lucrative trade, for collecting all sorts of funds for the good of Allah and Mohammad; in the sense, if the mosques remain in operation, the Muslims would be supplicating, beating rosary beads, and performing all other rituals to keep them alive in people’s minds Similarly, when Sunnis saw Shi’ahs racking in money with all hands on the Aashoora عا شو را commemorative parade taken out for the fictitious martyrs of Karbala, they decided to cash in the birthday of Mohammad. They started taking out processions consisting of bullock cart floats along with a large number of horse and camel riders, wearing typical Arab warrior dresses, in various Muslim countries. Here, a very basic question pops up. Does the Qur’an instruct the humans anywhere in its entire text to celebrate the anniversary of Mohammad or worship the lion god Ali, Fatima Hassan and Hussian? If that is not so, where do the Muslims get their queue for wasting so much energy, time and money for observing those religious events? Another question is did Mohammad ever throw a party during his lifetime on his birthday, or his stalwart friends did some thing of the sort, after his passing away? If the answer to all of the three queries mentioned above is a definite no, then wherefrom the Muslims in the 21st century get the permission to do something, which never happened in the time and life of Mohammad and his associates? The Qur’an declares that even the most high-ranking people on this planet, like Mohammad, Jesus, and other Messengers of Allah have no right to order their respective people to worship, or extol them unnecessarily. Allah’s commandments only deserve that kind of submission. [3:79, 80]
‘In a state established upon the tenets of the Qur’an, the basic underlying principle remains such that no human being, even the most high ranking Messenger of Allah, has any right to ask his people, “Worship me, and obey my orders rather than that of Allah.” This is irrespective of the fact that such a person may have received Allah’s set of laws, together with wisdom, judgment, and the power to enforce it. On the contrary, he is supposed to say, “Devote yourself to Allah’s legal system and coordinate a nurturing arrangement for the entire humanity, by following His Book that you personally study and teach others!’
Therefore, the Quran does not permit the promotion of any kind of personality cult, or establishment of celebrity status for any one through media hype. Eulogizing dead humans is against the charter of the Qur’an, because nothing fruitful comes out of that effort. This constitutes an exercise in futility, and the Qur’an forbids all such practices. Incidentally, the Shi’ah religion has nothing to offer, except the worst kind of personality cult and hero worship of the characters, which never existed on the face of the earth. All of them are fictitious, and created by the despicable, disruptive, and devastating minds of the Iranian Aimmah.
Charity
It is strange, the worldwide charity and donation collecting organizations are doing their business in the name of God. The Christian Church Ministries established on the air, and especially working through the TV channels give out very potent message to their faithful followers for racking in lots of loot. They voice a very exciting line repeatedly, “Let Jesus come into your heart.” The question is how Jesus can come into the heart of the people, 2,006 years later, after his passing away, when according to the Christian Gospel, he could not do anything to save his own skin, and accepted crucifixion at the joint hands of the Roman governor and the Jewish priesthood. The people who dish out charity on such calls must be dumb. The con artists in the garb of Muslim clergy are even worst than their Christian counterparts. They ask for every bit and scrap of money for which they find any authenticity in the Qur’an. Now, they are even begging for Sadaqaat, which only a legitimate government, established upon the charter of the Qur’an, has the authority to collect, only in an emergent situation. The religious leaders of every religion are vultures, which live in a grandiose style, without earning a single cent themselves. None of them goes for the rigorous 9-5 job, or does the shift work, which the ordinary citizens of the most advanced nations have to brave, to make a decent living. Recently a very disturbing report is circulating in the North American media, which states categorically that 80% of the funds collected by any charitable organization cover the administrative cost, whereas only 20% go to alleviate the cause for which the specific charity is ‘working so hard.’ Donation and charity business is booming in North America, and the big business has its involvement in this game, the big way. The corporate sector dishes out all kinds of, political, religious, and social handouts to the ‘needy people’ for the following reasons:
Ø The corporations, which suck the last drop of blood out of their workforce, the backbone of their empires, donate millions of dollars to the political beggars, religious parasites, and social conmen, instead of doing anything worthwhile for their employees, just for the sake of tax breaks, which sometimes go as high as 35%. Ø The political donations give the corporations, effective influence in the corridors of power, as they have already set up their lobbies, which watch their interest. Some people are of the opinion that politicians are like putty in the hands of corporate heads, and they do everything in their power to keep them happy, otherwise they would not get any funds to run their expensive election campaigns. Ø The corporations dish out funds to the churches, synagogues, now even mosques and temples to show the people the extent of their philanthropy for the good cause of maintaining religious freedom. They have to do that to get the tax breaks. If they give that money to their employees, they would get nothing in return from the government.
A fine example of religion working for the benefit of its primary institution [the Church] is vividly represented by the life and time of Mother Teresa. When alive, she was revered as a great Christian missionary, who started working in 1952 for the uplift of the poverty-stricken in Kolkata [Calcutta], India. The purpose was to increase the number of demographic minority of Indian Christians, because just before her arrival on the scene, that particular community, like Muslims, was facing a severe communal discrimination. Here a very pertinent question comes up. If she was a social worker, then why was she working under the protective umbrella of the Christian Church? She could be like Rabinder Nath Taigore, who consistently worked throughout his life for social reforms in India, through the creation of his ingenious and marvelous literary masterpieces. The worldwide multinationals supported Mother Teresa for her work, who religiously tried to establish the Christian faith amongst the poorest of the poor in India. That was the community, which needed utmost help in the face of persecution at the hands of the upper cast Hindu majority. Strangely enough, it is always the game of numbers, which is of vital importance for the survival of a nation. Mother Teresa used the donated capital of capitalist organizations to convert lowest cast Hindus to Christianity. She did nothing to improve their living standard, through improving their skills of earning a decent livelihood, which is the only way to build a community on a sound economical footing. There was or rather still is a dire need to re-educate those Indians to improve the proficiency of their native profession, and to learn new trades for improving their lot, with their own efforts. They could be given better equipment for their trade, but nothing of that sort happened. Keeping people on charity is a criminal offence, because it does not given them any sense of achievement to build up personal self-respect. They do not become productive and look towards others for their survival. The best way to help people is to re-educate them, equip them properly, provide them opportunities to show their professional prowess, with the proviso, when they become productive, they return the total original investment, with equitable markup, if possible. The ‘holy’ Mother Teresa did nothing of the sort. Her institution provides stopgap arrangement, which is of no use at all. The people were having a miserable life before she came on the scene, and are still living the same way; in the concrete pipes. Her mission in India is an utter failure, whereas Indian state of Kerala is booming, because no one in that state is surviving on donations and charity. The Qur’an openly condemns this kind of capitalist oriented religious based charity system [charity organizations of the Western countries], wherein existence of ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’ is essential, for demonstrating the love of humans, to God. However, the biggest problem with this system is that people on the receiving end, lose their self-respect, dignity and confidence. They can never be progressive, dynamic, or effective in their own way, and always look forward to the upper hand, belonging to the donor. In fact, the slogans like, ‘for the love of God, Jesus or Mohammad’ are just empty words, which mean nothing to the benefactor; all they are interested to know is how much money they can save from the Revenue Canada or Internal Revenue Service in the USA. The Qur’an presents the perfect fiscal solution to the dilemma or rather rigmarole of taxes and charity, together with maintaining the self-esteem of every individual, in the form of Zakah. This system ensures the provision of all amenities of life to the people, along with creating a progressive, prosperous, and secure society, wherein its members enjoy life without any fear.
Zakah
The Qur’an declares, unequivocally; every member of the workforce, irrespective of gender, has to work diligently, in accordance with one’s education, skill, and expertise in a chosen profession to generate income for personal and family maintenance. No taxation system is put in place, because no taxes are ever to be collected. However, every breadwinner has to voluntarily deposit, funds over and above one’s total requirement into the national exchequer for the government to run its administration, and public programs. Mohammad, who remains a role model of the economic system of the Qur’an until this day, did not pay 2.5% Zakah on his annual savings during his entire lifetime, because he never had any savings in the first place, as he never kept anything more than his own and family requirements. In fact, paying 2.5% Zakah on the total yearly savings defeats the very purpose of this system and is tantamount to complete defiance of the tenets of the last revelation. The Islamic priesthood invented this rate of Zakah payment for the kings, princes and other rich people to protect their treasures and amassed wealth from distribution among their subjects. Additionally, this is the easiest ‘Islamic’ way out, to convert black money into white. It is the pinnacle of the capitalist system. Currently, throughout the Muslim world all types of taxes, prevalent in the Western democracies, are levied along with the so-called Islamic dues in the form of Zakah, Fatrana and Sadaqaat. Charity comes on top of it all. Despite all that, not a single Muslim country is financially well off. None of them is either advanced or rich, including the oil loaded Kingdoms and Sheikhdoms. In terms of Islamic Fiqah and Ahadith, the word Zakah signifies that every Muslim of means must pay an amount equivalent to 2.5% of one’s yearly savings to either needy or destitute people or to the government. The Islamic priesthood came up with the arbitrary figure of 2.5 % Zakah, as charity tax or more appropriately the ‘Bully Tax’ and protected the immense wealth of the ruling kings, their cohorts and other rich people. On top of that, the Muslim priesthood has also coined the terms Fatrana, charity, and donation for the sake of Swab. On the occasions of weekly Juma and Eid congregations, along with the whole month of Ramadan, the leaders of every sect go on an alms-collecting spree, in the name of Allah. In their religious sermons, they appeal to the simple-minded sectarian assembly to give them Zakah, charity, Fatrana and Sadaqaat for the construction of a new mosque to accommodate the expanding community belonging to their sect. They play all dirty tricks in the book to grab money. They offer the rich, buxom Hoors possessing exquisite beauty, adorned with almond shaped eyes, like those of a gazelle, in the next life. The poor Muslims get the message; Allah is testing their mettle in this world, to reward them in the hereafter. They are also given to understand that this life is just a transitory period, or fleeting moment; they should forget about it and look forward to the life after death. This way the Ummah is divided into two distinct classes, ‘haves’, and ‘have-nots’ that suits the clergy’s plan of action, with Allah right in the middle. The engineered system of Zakah cannot work without the existence of ‘donor’ and ‘receiver’ stratums of the society. There have to be destitute in large numbers for receiving the Zakah, a good portion of which ends up in the pockets of the religious priests, as their cut of the loot. However, this synthetic system of Zakah is an outright humiliation of human integrity and reduces the unfortunate Muslims to the status of beggars. However, the Qur’an regards every human being as an equally respected individual, and institution of such a Zakah system, which never existed in the time of the last Messenger of Allah, is an outright rejection of the clear injunction of the divine constitution. The present 2.5% Zakah on the total yearly savings of an individual or a corporation is nowhere mentioned in the Qur’an. It is interesting to note, the Shi’ah cult claims exemption from paying even current rate. They seem to be the real followers of Mohammad, who also did not pay Zakah at the prevalent tariff, fixed by the Muslim clergy [2.5% of yearly savings]. They might go for the real thing, handing over every cent in excess of their personal needs. Unfortunately, in the Shi’ah Iran, the Comprehensive Tax Scheme presently in force has nothing to do with the Zakah system of the Qur’an, as it is set up on the typical capitalist economic pattern of the West, which the Mullahs of the Guardian Council seem to hate. The current constitution of Iran is also worlds apart from that presented in the last revelation of Allah. It is a totalitarian system that the Mullah hegemony is running, without even basic freedoms provided to the people. The cultist Iran is the worst possible representation of dictatorship. In the 21st century, the people are still paying homage to the individuals, who passed away over 14 centuries ago. Some of the characters, they revere the most did not exist. Mohammad did not have any daughter called Fatima, because it is a non-Arabic name, created by the Iranian Aimmah, the biggest liars of all time. In the absence of Fatima, neither Ali became son-in-law of Mohammad, nor did he ever get two sons, by the name of Hassan and Hussain. The story revolving around those four characters is baseless, and the sad events attributed to them never happened. This is the typical demonstration of ‘much a do about nothing.’ To learn more about this topic, please go through the chapter on Zakah. There are many unsubstantiated fables described by most of the Shi’ah historians and the authors of Ahadith that Mohammad and his companions were so much poverty-stricken, they could not even afford to have two square meals a day. To cut down the pangs of hunger emanating from their empty stomachs, each one of them used to tie average-sized round stone to his midriff just to trick his digestive system of having full belly. The same literature, unequivocally, proves, Ali was one of the richest persons of his time. The list of his movable and immovable property along with the people in the household is given under the following heading:
Ali’s Heritage for his Successors
Allama Ibne-Khaldoon, on the authority of Allama Masoodi, has provided some interesting or rather amazing information pertaining to the assets or legacies of some of the close companions of Mohammed, which are presented below for the interest of readers:
Othman
His survivors got hold of the following heritage, upon his departure as a martyr: § He left 100,000.00 Dinars and 10,000,000.00 Dirham all in hard cash. § In addition, he had assets worth 200,000.00 Dinars. § He owned horses valued at 150,000.00 Dinars.
Abdur Rahman-ibne-Aouf
He left one thousand horses, one thousand camel, and ten thousands goats, as his inheritance.
Zaid -bin-Sabat
Upon his death, he left behind a heap of gold and silver, besides 100,000.00 Dinars and vast gardens in the vicinities of Iskandria [Egypt] and in Basra [Iraq]
Zubair
The Islamic literature represents him as one of the most stalwart companions of Mohammad, and the same sources also point out, he was actively involved in the despicable trade of buying and selling maidservants [like a big time pimp] prohibited by the Qur’an. At his death, his estate comprised of the following:
Ø Over 1,000 horses Ø Gorgeous maidservants [1,000] for sale Ø Gold coins counted at 200,000 Ø In addition to a big chunk of real estate, he also owned a large herd of sheep and camel, with the daily earning of 1,000 gold coins.
It seems logical to check the authenticity of the above claims, made by the authors of the ostensible Islamic literature from the Qur’an, by utilizing Allah’s gift of innate human intelligence and power of reasoning. The Qur’an clearly states in the verse 17:70 that every human being is equally honorable from Allah’s standpoint. It is, however, mind boggling to believe, Zubair being a respectable associate of Mohammad could be involved in the forbidden business of slave [particularly female] trading.
‘Every member of the human species, which We evolved in billions of years to its current state of perfection, is equally respectable in accordance with the code of Allah.’
The Qur’an commands humans that wealth should not remain within or circulate only among a few families, cartels, or corporations. In view of this unequivocal directive, pertaining to the fiscal management of the state, the question arises how Ali, Othman, or Zubair could dare to ignore the clear-cut commands of the Qur’an, and accumulate immense amount of wealth for personal use. However, the Qur’an suggests that the medium-sized local industrial and commercial enterprises must be encouraged, and integrated with the new and ongoing projects, to check one-sided profit grabbing practice of the foreign collaborators. [59:7]
‘Wealth, along with the means of sustenance, must not remain in the hands of a limited number of rich families, a few organizations [like modern multinationals] or some rich countries.’
An adequate and efficiently working economic system is extremely important for maintaining and improving the living standard of any nation. To answer the constant queries of Mohammad’s companions in this context, Allah enunciated the guiding principle in the following verse: [2:219]
‘Mohammad, your companions are asking you time and again, what can they do to ensure means of sustenance, for the entire humanity? You should go ahead, and tell them, “Relinquish, what is over and above your personal or family needs, to the state! You should easily understand His simple commandments, because of His excellent power of expression, pertaining to the economic management of the state. In fact, based on this know-how, you can and should build an excellent financial administration, and establish monetary research organizations for the service of entire humanity.”
In the presence of the above directives of the Qur’an, regarding equitable distribution of wealth, how the honorable companions of Mohammad, like Othman, Ali, Zubair and all others, could amass immense resources of wealth for their personal use, which is only permissible under the functioning of an idealistic capitalist system. Certainly, the associates of the last Messenger of Allah, who worked exceptionally hard with utmost honesty, guaranteed by the Qur’an, did not keep any resources over and above their personal and family requirement. The Ahadith and Sunnah writers of Iran, created fictitious amount of legacy, left behind by each companion of Mohammad, because they hated them all, the most, except Ali, the conjured up son-in-law of Mohammad. The verse 59:9 clearly explains, the companions of Mohammad were living for the service of other members of the society, and were not building up their personal assets in the form of property and wealth.
‘Men and women working for the establishment of a peaceful society, under the command of Mohammad, give preference to the needs of others compared to their own, though they might have to endure personal hardships going that way.’
Allah, in the verse 48:29 says, the comrades of Mohammad loved each other [as an expectant mother loves her unborn baby], and work for the development and sustenance of each other. With this definition instilled in their minds, it is ludicrous even to imagine for a moment, they could amass the kind of wealth mentioned by the Ahadith, Sunnah and Tradition writers of the 3rd and 4th centuries.
‘Mohammad is the Messenger of Allah and his companions love each other [just as a mother loves her children], because of sharing and supporting the principles, enunciated by the Qur’an. They are firm, strong, and solid like a rock for those, who conceal or oppose the commandments of the last revelation of Allah.’
The Qur’an, in the verse 8:74, immensely appreciates the companions of Mohammad, for achieving overwhelming success, pertaining to the establishment of the just and equitable economic system, based on the divine order.
‘The companions of Mohammad were the true Momineen [working for peace].They successfully established a peaceful society, wherein they completely protected themselves, with regards to all necessary provisions of life, by earning their living through right and honorable means.’
The compatriots of Mohammad, under his brilliant leadership, created a social and economic revolution unparalleled in the human history. First, they got personally convinced with the constitution, and the code of conduct presented by the Qur’an, utilizing Allah given gift of innate intelligence and power of reasoning. Then, they whole-heartedly supported Allah’s last Messenger, through thick and thin, and never ever betrayed him. Because of their efforts, Allah rewarded them with a peaceful, progressive, and prosperous society, wherein people lived together promoting unity, faith, and discipline. [9:100]
‘On account of their outstanding achievements in all possible walks of life, Allah is more than pleased with them. On the other hand, they are equally delighted with Allah’s rewards in the form of peace, prosperity, and progress, which are having a strong foothold in their society. A green revolution is in progress and the economy is like a flowing waterway [keeping money in circulation] irrigating every piece of land, under the till. This is their fantastic attainment, which they secured because of their self-confidence, coupled with diligent effort.’
The Iranian Imams, the real authors of Ahadith, Sunnah, Traditions, and Fiqah, along with die-hard Shi’ah historians, did not have any respect for the Arab companions of the Arab Messenger of Allah, who virtually ran over their ‘majestic’ empire. In fact, they let hatred simmer in their hearts, like the ‘sacred fire’, which keeps on burning in their Zoroastrian temples over millennia. They were looking for the right time to avenge their ‘honor’, and remained in the vanguard of conspiracies to topple the Banu Umayyad dynasty, which was equally rotten and way off the administration specified by the Qur’an. Finally, they found a stooge in the person of Abu Al-Abbas Al-Saffah, founder of the Abbasid dynasty. This time their conspiracy proved to be a resounding success, and as they had done all the planning and hard work to uproot the hold of Umayyad, they became the closest allies of the caliph, and wielded maximum influence in his administration. The Abbasid remained in power over five centuries [750 – 1258 A.D.], and during that time, they systematically decimated the literature generated by the Arab writers, pertaining to various topic like the constitution of the Qur’an, administration of Mohammad, and that of his noble companions after he passed away, along with much more. It is really mind boggling to note, that not a single page written by an Arab writer, since the time of Mohammad to the Abbasid period is available now. There is a gaping hole of three centuries without any Arabic literature ever appearing. Is it not strange, that a nation proud of its language and rich literary heritage, turned mentally barren, in the period ensuing after the departure of Mohammad, when the age of enlightenment in the Arab Peninsula had actually dawned? Along with the destruction of the existing Arabic literature, the Iranian Aimmah [both Shi’ah and Sunni], the biggest conspirators against Allah, Mohammad and the Qur’an, started producing their own writings in the name of the last Messenger. The idea was to blast out the unity of the Muslim Ummah into as many sects as possible. Since then the Muslims stand divided, and seem to be drifting apart, continually. There is not even a glimmer of hope of their ever becoming together, as they were in the time of Mohammad. The Iranian literature comprising of Ahadith, Sunnah, Fiqah, Traditions, expositions of the Qur’an, and last but not the least, biased history churned out by the Shi’ah historians, does nothing, except ridiculing Mohammad and his honorable associates, along with misinterpreting the real message of the Qur’an, through flawed expositions. Unfortunately, the prevalent Muslim priesthood considers the Iranian conspiratorial literature, as the very basis of the ‘religion Islam.’ Originally, Al-Deen was free of all rituals like worthless Nimaz [Iranian word], useless Darood-o- Salam, futile Zikar, and all prevalent time wasting Adiyya [plural of Dua], rites, and customs. However, Al-Deen is dead for a millennium, and the ‘religion, known as Islam’, is now in existence and thriving. It seems appropriate, to mention certain rules followed for the presentation of this document, which shall make it both easy and enjoyable for the readers to go through the content, which are as follows:
1) All translations of the Qur’an are in bold script [besides the headings of chapters, subchapters], bounded by apostrophes, with a space between the last line of the translation and the new paragraph. 2) The Arabic words, terms, expressions, besides proper nouns, and excerpts from various references are in Italics. The time marking is in the traditional or conventional B.C. and A.D. abbreviations, instead of BCE and CE, for easy correlation of the people, which are familiar with the former acronyms.
|
|
Send questions or comments to Akhtar Sherazi |
,
the divine charter or the constitution, for establishing an Islamic
government. Allah has revealed this document for all humans to create
a genuine heaven on earth, for every individual to enjoy, without any
apprehension at all. 
is
a conditional clause. According to the Arabic grammar, it consists
of two parts:
does not translate into ‘the women you like or look good to you.’ It
really means you may marry those women, who kind of like you. Thus,
another stipulation for polygamy is that the women you intend to
marry must be ready to accept you as their husbands, and you have
their prior permission to that effect before joining you in Nikah!
signifies
that one should act in a fair and just manner. Another condition for
polygamy is that the person should provide subsistence to his wives
evenhandedly. If he is not sure about doing justice to all
concerned, it would then be better for him to follow the principle
of monogamy and stay put with his only wife.
.
This word carries a host of meanings, starting with right, having a
right direction, straight or even, equal, composed or levelheaded,
symmetrical or proportionate and suitable on the whole or in parts
or in quality and quantity.
means
anything that traumatizes a person’s mind or puts him/her under
unnecessary stress.
.
Most of the purported Muslim scholars have interpreted this term to
mean bondwomen, with whom illicit sexual relations can be
established just for the sake of pleasure and enjoyment. As a step
forward, they can even be swapped with their counterparts in
possession of other people, to provide an opportunity for enjoying
multiple bed partners or arranging regular orgies. After all
‘variety is the spice of life.’
