|
HERO WORSHIPING |
|
Khaleel Saddiqi Najeeb Kazmi and his like minded cohorts. According to the message of the Quran, taking the life of an individual unjustly or deliberately is equal to the slaying of the entire humanity. I do not want to discuss whether her assassination was justified or not. People from different schools of thought have labeled her as an “Champion of democracy”, “Hope for Pakistan”, "Hope for women", "Charismatic", or "Hope for the poor” and so forth In my opinion, I firmly believe that she was just another criminal -out of the many criminal like political leaders thriving in Pakistan. It’s quite odd that her supporters have failed to look at the facts and question how she managed to purchase numerous properties across the world. Further, they have further seemed to turn a blind eye to the fact that both Bhutto and her husband have been convicted for their crimes in countries such as swtizerland- and these crimes are just the “tip of the iceberg” Mr. Siddaque comments below are worth a lot of respect, he clearly states that the people of Pakistan blindly worship their leaders and behave in a mindless and directionless manner.
“MUSLIMS ARE INHERENTLY HERO-WORSHIPPERS. SEE THE HISTORY OF ISLAM. EXCEPT THE PERIOD OF THE HOLY PROPHET & HIS THREE CALIPHS, NAMELY: ABUBAKAR, UMER & USMAN (R.A.s), THE MUSLIM HISTORY LINGERS ARROUND THEIR "SO CALLED" HEROES ! WILL YOU ALLOW ME TO BE HONEST TO DESCRIBE THE DEEDS OF THESE HEROES NO DOUBT, SHE WAS BEAUTIFUL & VERY WELL EDUCATED BUT SHE DID NOTHING PRACTICALLY FOR THE NATION AND HAD COME TO GRAB THE POWER WITH THE BLESSINGS OF USA & JEWS. PAKISTANIS, WHO ARE INHERENTLY HERO-WORSHIPPERS, MOURNING HER DEATH BECASUE SHE WAS THE DAUGHTER OF A HERO. IN FACT, SHE HAS BEEN AN EXTREMELY SELF CENTERED PERSONALITY, WWHO WAS ONLY POWER SEEKER. SHE ALWAYS IGNORED AND DEFENDED THE ILLS & CRIMES OF HER HUSBAND. SHE COULD NOT EVEN FIND AND ARREST THE KILLERS OF HER REAL BROHER,MURTAZA BHUTTO, ALTHOUGH SHE WAS PM OF THE COUNTRY WHEN HE WAS MURDERED. FINALLY SHE TURNED PPP INTO A FAMILY PROPERTY BY NOMINATING, IN HER WILL, HER TEEN AGED SON AND HER NOTORIOUS HUSBAND AS HER HEIR AND SUCCESSOR. DOES SHE STILL DESERVE PRAISE & HONOUR, JUST BEING A DAUGHTER OF A HERO” As usual in the response of above comments Mr. Kazmi has instantly responded with following hypocrite melody. “I would like to remind you to please use selective judgement in posting comments on this page. As forum moderator, it is better to ensure that the commenters stick to the subject matter only and not include personal derogatory remarks about lot of other religious personalities, whether sunni, shia, Ahmadi, Ismaili or whoever, as this discussion is only meant to be on the deceased leader of People's Party. If the commenter is keen to talk about "everything under the sun", he should wait for a new thread entitled, "everything under the sun". Writing all kinds of mumbo jumbo will only invite more mumbo jumbo and this will only accelerate a non-related and unnecessary stream of non related verbal war. To keep the comments & views focused on the subject, moderator has to condense/abridge the various posts. All kinds of bullshit does not help anyone learn and tolerate each other's views.” It is very strange that giving comments on the curse of hero worshipping especially on Ali has caused personal derogatory to religious personalities of Sunni, shi'ah, Ahmadi, Ismaili and other innumerable sects. Mr.Kazmi in your effort to stop the criticism on the shi’ah cult and personality worshipping practice you are in deed protecting your sect from right and genuine criticism and justifying the legitimacy of other sects. This kind statement is the revolt against the Qur’anic Message according to which, “Dividing the humanity based on religion, creed, color, gender, language, nationalism and patriotism are unforgivable offence against the constitution of the Quran.” In verse 6:159 the Quran has declared that Mohammad you have nothing to do with the people who have divided and disintegrated the humanity in to different sects and political parties.
As Allah is unique by Himself, therefore, the system, devised by Him for the entire humanity, is also unique and the united Muslim Ummah must follow it as a single entity. ‘Look Mohammad! You have nothing to do with the people, who break away from your group, conspire against Al-Deen [divine system] and disintegrate previously unified people into various sects. Leave them alone and do not waste your time with them. Allah’s justice shall decide their fate, when the time comes. He shall tell them openly what they had been doing: forming sects and dissipating their energies through internal strife, instead of spreading the message of Allah, by joining hands and working together.’
Let me remind you that from the same podium derogatory remarks were expressed about Allah or God, Mohammad, Quran and other religious leaders. Where were you at that time? Suprisingly, no personal degradation was caused to religious personalities of Sunni, shi'ah, Ahmadi and Ismaili sects. I have come across many Shiah’s who claim to be very liberal in their beliefs about religion, but at the time of “Ashoora” celebration,- then spontaneously they start worshipping personalities like Ali, Hassan, Fatima, Hussein. The Quran is deadly against cult, personality adoring and all other kinds of worshiping in order to earn the favor of God. The Qur’an declares that even the most high-ranking personalities on this planet, like Mohammad, Jesus and other Messengers of Allah have no right to command their people to worship, or obey them. That kind of submission is reserved only for Allah and His rules. [3:79-80]
‘In a state established on the Qur’anic tenets, the basic underlying principle remains such that no human being, even the most high ranking Messenger of Allah, having received Allah’s set of laws together with wisdom, judgment and the power to enforce it, has any right to ask his people, “Worship me and obey my command rather than that of Allah.” On the contrary, he is supposed to say, “Devote yourself to Allah‘s legal system and coordinate a nurturing arrangement for the whole humanity, by following His Book that you personally study and teach others!’ Therefore, the Qur’an has rooted out all kinds of personality fads. It is regrettable to observe that currently 1.35 billion Muslims, who claim that they are the custodians of the Qur’an, are idolizing black and green colors [colors revered by Shi’ah and Sunni sects], shrines of the dead saints, kings, parliaments, religious leaders, Imams, Sufis, Western culture, wealth, dead and living mystics. After the assassination of BB [Life time chairwoman of the democratic people party] her political party has assumed the shape of a Dynasty ruled by her nineteen year old King- Bilawal. Since Asif Zardri is from a stench Shi’ah family therefore this party is now amalgamated with the Shi’ah priesthood, Bhutto cum Zardari Dynasty, feudal lords and a group of capitalists. I think it is privilege for me to explain you from this forum, the catastrophic effects of cult and personality worshipping in any society. WORSHIPPING OF ALI
There are over 200 factions thriving under the umbrella of Shiah sect and invariably all of them revere their Imams, especially, Ali, Hussan and Hussein, as some kind of demigods. Their clergy have coined different divine titles for them, by which the clerics [Zakirs] often address them in their sermons. For instance, they add term Moula, as a gesture of reverence to Ali, but the Qur’an restricts this portrayal only for Allah and no one else. Moula, actually denotes the embodiment of Allah’s code, which when implemented properly, assures the protection of the people living under such a system. It, therefore, means that when the devout Shi’ah call upon Ali as Moula, they are in fact elevating his status to that of Allah, which constitutes the most despicable Shirk possible. In the verse 8:40, the Qur’an incorporates the expression Moula to prescribe Allah’s personality, as a protector and helper for the entire universe.
‘O Mohammad! If they stop supporting this peaceful program, Allah would ascertain their ulterior motives. If they back out from their solemn pledge, then just rest assured Allah would protect you from their evil designs. He is, indeed, the greatest protector and excellent helper.’
According to the above verse, Allah and not Ali, is the real Moula [protector and helper of the righteous people]. For that matter, the late Moulana Abual Ala-Moudoodi, and the innumerable living Moulanas all over the world are trying to usurp the qualifying attribute specifically reserved and preserved for the creator of this universe and beyond. They have and are committing the gravest crime of sharing one of Allah’s most magnificent characteristics, which is termed as Shirk from the Qur’an’s standpoint. In the verse 22:78, the Qur’an once again demolishes the Moula myth created by Shi’ah and Sunni Imams and delivers a stinging blow to the dead and living individuals, who decorated or renovated their names with the addition of the term Moulana. In deed, they happen to be the most Arabic ignorant people on face of the earth.
‘Hold on steadfastly to the Allah’s code and commandments and take shelter in the abode created with their implementation. Undoubtedly, He is the guardian and protector of the people and is their best associate.’
Ali, a mortal, could never attain such a position and it is a criminal act, as per the last revelation of Allah to associate any one with Him, in any capacity. No one has any right to promote any person to the position it does not deserve like that of a protector, guardian helper, as Allah is the only one accredited with those qualifications. The Shi’ahs also labels Ali as Shair- e- Khuda [God’s tiger; which God is that has yet to be determined]. Allah created him as an honorable human being, but his followers turned him into a wild beast. What a pity! The Christian God created a son to give him a hand for managing his ever-expanding estate and according to the Church; he is doing a wonderful job. Akin to that mode of thinking, the Shi’ahs came up with the concept of Shair- e- Khuda [God’s tiger], which means the God in question, does not need Ali as a decent human being, but wants him to be in the form of a ferocious beast of prey for taking charge of his Kingdom. The Shi’ah concept of Moula Ali is much more derogatory, as compared to the Christian faith of Jesus being the Son of God. In that form, Jesus at least maintains his human status, whereas Ali, an honorable associate of Mohammad is turned into raw meat devouring wild animal, which is also supposed to guard the universe of some God. This fictitious line of thinking is not only preposterous, but is utterly insulting for the magnificent close relative of Mohammad. Allah incorporates the word مو لأ نا Moulana in the following verse to define His characteristic as a defender. [2:286]
‘O’ Allah! Please don’t take us to the task, because of the inadvertent mistakes we made [during the struggle for establishing administration, as per the Qur’an’s charter] and do not burden us with additional difficult responsibilities, for the same reason. O’ Allah! Improve our capabilities for implementing the constitution of the Qur’an. You are our only shield; please make us successful against those, who oppose the divine social setup and try their level best to misguide the people, in order to conceal the blessings and bounties this revelation bestows upon the society, upon its application.’
In the above and 14 other verses of
the Qur’an, Allah has utilized the term Moulana Out of innumerable ‘praiseworthy’ Moulanas produced by the Muslim culture, only two, namely, Moulana Roomi [minder and keeper of the city of Room] and Moulana Abul Ala-Moudoodi [father of the best, possessing Allah’s specific qualities mentioned above] deserve a bit more discussion. The fact remains that Moulana Roomi was bisexual, with a strong inclination towards sodomy. He developed homosexual relations with young lads for having a good time and Shams Tabraiz remained his most desirable and coveted darling for a long time. Ibni Arabi was his mentor, and he propagated the ‘teachings’ of his mystic guru. His greatest contribution to Islam and the Muslim culture seems to be the introduction of a spinning and rotating kind of mystical dancing [classified as ‘rhythmic motion of a top’] in the streets of his city, in a totally inebriated state. Moulana Moudoodi, who claimed to be the father of the best, and wrote ‘Tafheem-ul-Qur’an’ in thirty-years, was totally ignorant pertaining to the real teachings and message of Allah’s last revelation. Instead of Abul Ala, he should have been called Abul Johla [father of illiterates]. His real service to Islam was that he and his party staunchly opposed the father of the nation, Quaid-e-Azam, Mohammad Ali Jinnah, for demanding Pakistan, a separate homeland for the Muslims of India. Once Pakistan appeared on the map of the world, this unscrupulous leader and his brazen party members rushed over to the new country for taking control of the administration, in the name of Islam. Since then they have been towing the line of their Hindu masters, who intend to demolish Pakistan through the anti-state activities of the beard wearing Mullah Mafia.
Almost every sect of Shi’ah adore personality of Ali and his off spring blindly in the different forms and shapes. Additionally, they called upon the followers of their sect to remember Ali with the title ‘Lion of God’ [Shair-e–Khuda], which they collectively bestowed upon him, because in their view, God does require the services of a lion to control this world. Factually, the Shi’ah copied this mythological concept from the Assyrian, Babylonian, Zoroastrian, Aryan and Christian cultures, which venerated lion as a symbol of power, authority and dominance. Some of their demigod statues carried head of a lion, on a human body. In Pakistan, the Habib Bank, which belongs to the Shi'ah community, has its logo engraved upon the front entrance of every branch, which represents Ali in the form of a lion god.
The Iranian Aimmah bestowed upon Ali numerous other titles, in their own language, to differentiate him from minor lion gods of other nations. They wanted to make him special for their own people, and more powerful as compared to the rest of gods. A few of these are as under:
· شير يز د ا ن: The Lion of Zorastrian God · شا ه مرد ان : The king of real macho men, an epitome of virility, a quintessence of libido, and the one enjoying satyriasis. · قو ت بر ور دكا ر;: The power of God. · حيد ر كر ا ر: Like a lion, repeatedly attacking its prey.
Lion-god Worship through History
Here follows the historical legacy of lion god, which many human civilizations revered and worshipped, before the Shi’ah Aimmah stole it, and called it their own, by casting Ali in that befitting role:
· The English nation, after accepting Christianity as its official religion, started worshiping the power of the lion. This icon of raw brutal force still adorns the currency of that nation. · The Egyptians, like the Shi'ah Muslims, recognized the beastly strength of lion, and included it in the list of their demigods. · The Greeks also worshipped lion god and goddess. · The Hindus also revere Washvanjee, which is in fact a lion god. · The Zoroastrians also have a lion God, which holds a sword in its right paw, with the sun god engraved on its back. · In India, the Ismaili Khooja community also worships Ali in the form of lion god. They consider Ali as an incarnation of Vishnoo, a powerful god of Hindu trinity. · Numerous Ahadith qualify or rather identify Ali with the title of ‘the lion of God.’
The Babylonian calendar had the twelve months named after their animal gods and deities. The Shi'ah priesthood straightforwardly stole that concept and created the myth of twelve Aimmah. Of course, the head of this pack is حيد ر كر ا ر, the big lion. However, it has yet to be decided to which animal categories the rest of the eleven belong, Or may be, which species they would best represent. The Babylonian civilization developed and reached its zenith in the land lying between the two rivers, Tigris and Euphrates, which is now a part of modern Iraq. Following were the main features of Babylonian civilization.
· One of the most powerful rulers of this kingdom was Nimrod. According to the legend, he built a new city Nineveh for the satisfaction of his evil desires. · He had countless wives, and ordered his subjects to worship the main god Ba’al, made of gold. If any one dared to disobey his command, that one ended up in the inferno alive. · He had an army of soothsayer, magicians, wizards, astrologers, and priests at his command to foretell the future. The concept of Jotish, or fortune telling among the Hindus, came from the Babylonian civilization. · Their mythological gods and goddesses practiced free sex. · In ancient Mesopotamia, especially, in Babylonian, Ishtar was the primary Goddess of life, men, women, nature, fertility, sex, sexual power, and birth. Ishtar was also the goddess of war and weapons and any victory was celebrated in her temples with offerings of produce and money as well as through a feast and orgy of sex and fornication with holy temple prostitutes. Every woman was required, at least once in her lifetime, usually after she was married, to go to the Temple of Ishtar. She waited there until a stranger came along, and threw a silver in her lap. Then she left the temple and had sex with the stranger, after which she could return home. She was not allowed to say no to the first man, who paid he up front. To quote the Greek historian Herodotus: "The worst Babylonian custom is that which compels every woman of the land once in her life to sit in the temple of love and have... intercourse with some stranger... the men pass and make their choice." Imam Baqar and other lecherous Shi’ah religious priests copied the evil idea of ‘blessed’ Mut’ah [temporary marriage] from Babylonian civilization for their cult. · The Babylonians had another yearly festival at night, wherein they used to turn off all light sources, and indulge in an orgy on grandiose scale, involving thousands of copulating couples. Hundreds committed incest, because of the darkness, as it was not possible to know, who was who. The Shi’ah celebration of Eid-e-Ghadeer is also a sacred and festive Babylonian cultural gift, which the sect enjoys to the hilt. · The concept of lion god and the worship of other animal-headed deities originated during the reign of Nimrod. He was a sex fiend, who did not spare even his mother and sister from satisfying his carnal lust with them. In his time, the fire worship began and the sun received the status of a god. The Hindu concept of fire worship or Agni Pooja is a sacred relic coming down from the Mesopotamian civilization. Its best manifestation occurs at the time of Deewali, or Deepawali, through ample lighting. People have a good time by drinking, gambling, and enjoying fireworks. A Hindu marriage is only recognized, when the marrying couple goes around the burning fire, called Pawiter Agni [pure fire], seven times. The Muslims also revere and remember the tradition established by Nimrod. They celebrate the festival of Shab-e-Barrat [the night of luck] by lighting up their homes, and practice many rituals, which has got nothing to do with Al-Deen. The Jews follow the tradition of Nimrod through the Candle Light Vigils, and the Christians do so by arranging tremendous illumination of their homes for almost three weeks at the time of Christmas. However, the Quran does not support above kind of foolish myths of Hindus avagon, Christians trinity, Muslims mystics concept of amalgamation with God after death, or Shiah pentagon views of Islam, or the ancient Egyptians faith of three ditties named Horus, Isis and Osis, or the Zoroastrian religion trinity concept of God.
Ali’s Heritage for his Successors
§ At the time of his death, Ali had 27.76 million rupees worth of property, which is equivalent to a trillion rupees [Pak] in the modern times. § He left four wives and 24 sons and daughters behind. § In addition, nineteen maidservants survived as he passed away. According to Ahadith, Ali suffered from Satyriasis, a condition identified as morbid lasciviousness in human males. In other words, he was addicted to sex, as a sex fiend, and used his maidservants [B5:447,637] for that purpose. Besides that, he used to have new female bed partner every night, under the license of Mut’ah [temporary marriage]. Another Ahadith says, one night Ali had an all night carnal bout with the sister of caliph Umar, again under the ‘holy auspices of Mut’ah.’ Incidentally, his eldest son Hassan died of excessive copulation, according to Mahmood Ahmad Abbassi. [Khlafat-e-Muawia-o- Yazeed (Ed. 1962)] § Ali left for his progeny an orchard of dates, with a yearly yield of 200 tones. § Imam Bukhari provides the details of greed personified in one of his Traditions. As the story goes, Ali and Abbass were the joint guardians of the Public Treasury. First, Ali fired Abbass from his post, and then took over all available funds. After his death, this wealth became the inheritance of Hassan and Hussain. [Bukhari, Al -Magazi, (Tradition No. 1206)]
According to the Islamic history, Ali had many children from his numerous wives, but the Zoroastrian Ahadith writers added two fictitious names, Hassan and Hussain to that list, for establishing the worst kind of personality cult among the Shi’ah sect of Islam, which the Qur’an rejects in the first place.
Hassan
Most of the Shi’ah historians are of the view; he was the eldest son of Ali, who married ninety-nine women during his short life span. However, Mullah Baqar Majleesi quoted in his book, entitled, Jillah Maloon [published in 1334 Higra from Tehran, Iran] that the number was much more higher, around two to three hundred. It is reported, that he died due to extreme debility he suffered, because of excessive sexual intercourse, be carried out with his so many wives. He had a strange way of proposing to a woman, he set his heart on to marry. The marriage proposal was always accompanied by a matching gift for would be bride. One hundred maidservants used to carry one thousand Dirham each, totaling D100, 000.00 [equivalent to $30,000.00 USD], to the girl’s house just as a token of respect for asking her hand in marriage. Though, Hassan used to receive large sums of money from Ameer Muawia off and on, yet he initially received five million Dirham, when he signed a peace treaty with him declaring himself out of the race for Khilafat [the throne]. No one knows the reason, but almost all historians have mentioned that at the time of his death, all his wives rushed to him bare feet and also did the same at the time of his funeral. It is imperative to check the authenticity of the above account using the yardstick of the Qur’an. According to the tenets of last revelation, monogamy is the basic rule, and men are supposed to follow it under normal circumstances. However, in an emergent situation, which drastically reduces the number of available men compared to that of the women, the Qur’an allows polygamy for a specified period. In modern times, this happened during the eight-year long Iran – Iraq war, causing two million casualties on both sides. In such a state of affairs, polygamy could be allowed, to absorb the extra number of unattached women, until such time, the situation normalized. Once that happened, the polygamy could be ruled out, re-establishing monogamy. It is a very simple concept to understand and the Qur’an precisely explains the same in the verse 4:3, given below:
‘If there ever arises a serious problem, endangering security and prosperity of your society, because of a large number of unprotected marriageable women [due to war or any other reason] along with orphans, then the Rule of Monogamy may be suspended for the duration of the emergency, by the established Muslim government! You may advise your companions to marry two, three, or four women of your liking.’
Here a question pops up, how Hassan could marry two to three hundred women during his short life span, when according to the Qur’an, he could not have more than four at one time? Did he not care even a bit about the last revelation of Allah, and its specific commandments, his maternal grandpa received? Was he a real sex fiend, who just used feminine flesh to satisfy his super libido, and then threw it away like a rag doll? Did he suffer from a condition called satyriasis, or morbid lasciviousness? Whatever, the case may be, the Islamic history paints him as a genuine Casanova of antiquity. However, in view of the above verse, and the tainted image of Hassan presented by the Muslim historians, the following three possibilities can occur:
1) If Hassan really married and divorced two to three hundred women for the sake of his personal sexual gratification, then he defied the Qur’an, and totally ignored its laws pertaining to matrimony. He committed a grave crime punishable by the Islamic government. 2) If he did not do anything of the sort, then the complete Islamic history is nothing, but a pile of junk. 3) If the Islamic history is a fake document, then Hassan did not exist, and whatever the historians have written about him is not true.
HUSSAIN
The research conducted by Dr. Shabeer Ahmad, and presented in his publication entitled, Dastan-e-Karbala shows that Husain did not die as per the legend created by the Iranian historians. The Iranian conspirators, lead by Hurmazan, murdered him in the bedroom of the governor’s official residence in Koofa, the office he had inherited, upon the death of his elder brother Hassan.
This means the much lamented events of Aashurah [first to tenth of Muharram, 62 Higra] portrayed by Tibri, in the first history book of Islam, on the evidence of Abu Makhnaf Loot bin Yahya, who appeared a century later, is nothing but pure and unadulterated fiction. The Iranian conspirators used Hussain as a puppet of convenience, to drive a wedge of hatred in the heart of the Muslim Ummah, with the added advantage of gaining the sympathy of illiterate followers of Mohammad.
Similarly, the research work conducted by Mahmood Ahmad Abbasi, which appeared in the form of a book entitled, Khlafat-e-Muawia-o-Yazeed [Ed. 1962] also proved that the mythological event of Karbala, narrated by Shi’ah historians, never happened. Allama Aslam Jaipuri has discussed in detail, the murder of Hussain, in his historical presentation known as, Tariekh-ul Ummat.
According to his research, this incident occurred around 62 or 64 Higra. However, the yearly commemorative procession started during the reign of Abbasid Caliph, Moiz-ud-Doula Vailmi, who issued a royal decree in 352 Higra [almost three centuries later] to that effect. According to the official declaration, the first ten days of every Moharram were earmarked for remembering the martyrdom of Hussain, his relatives and friends in Karbala, along with laying down the procedure to be followed strictly on the tenth day, called Aashura [the day of lamenting]. On that day, all markets would remain closed and men would beat their chests in groups moving along with the procession. Women shall also join in, but they shall remain at the tail end. They shall wail and cry aloud, beating their heads and chests, with their hair hanging loose. The local Sunni population considered this newly introduced ritual offensive, and being against the tenets of the Qur’an, vehemently opposed it. The ruling caliph became aggressive in response and demanded full compliance with his royal decree. Additionally, he ordered the Sunni population to celebrate 18 Zilhaj, as the day of mourning for the martyrs of Karbala.
In face of an untoward reaction from his unified Sunni subjects, he went berserk and crossed all limits of decency. On his direct order, Tabarra [nastily insulting the dearest companions of Mohammad] posters were pasted on the inner, as well as outer walls of the Sunni mosques. That was the limit, and the Sunnis finally decided to get out of Baghdad, and settle in far flung cities. Incidentally, the Shi'ah sect expresses exceptional honor and gratitude, even in the 21st century, for the person, who murdered Umar-e-Farooq, the second caliph, as per their perverted and besmirched history. Though his given name was Feroz, yet the Shi'ah community honored him with the title of Abu L’u-L’u [dad of diamond] for his meritorious service of killing the closest friend of Mohammad, according to their profusely corrupted annals. He lies buried in a mausoleum recognized as that of Baba L’u- L’u, situated in the city of Qum, and is considered much more venerable as compared to those of Najaf and Karbala. The Shi'ah come visiting that shrine from all over the world, and pay rich tribute to him, by buying and wearing silver rings studded with cheap beryl [Aluminum Silicate] type gemstone called Feroza, named after him. Almost every Shi'ah wears the Feroza ring as a tribute to Abu L’u-L’u, and simultaneously cursing, or hurling Tabarra, primarily, upon Umar, and all others noble and stalwart companions of Mohammad.
The supposed episode of Karbala occurred in 62 Higra, and the commemorative procession of Aashura began almost three centuries later, that even upon the decree of a caliph. Does it not sound odd? The straight and simple logic demands that if something of that magnitude did happen, the people should have started the memorial proceedings right away. They did not have to wait three hundred years for a caliph to come along, and make a beginning, utilizing his powers and authority. In fact, he started something, people did not consider worth their while, to waste their time.
Many modern historians are of the view that nothing of the sort did actually happen. Hussain was a close relative of the caliph Yazid, and did willingly accept his position and authority in the centre. For that reason, he, following the footsteps of his father Ali, and elder brother Hassan, inherited the coveted post of Kufa’s governor. The phony account of his martyrdom surfaced over two centuries later, when the Iranian influence reached its pinnacle in the Abbasid court and harem.
The name Hussain qualifies a person, who makes up his mind regarding any matter, after giving it a serious thought, utilizing his innate wisdom and sense of reasoning. If there really did exist any Hussain, claiming to be the grandson of Mohammad, then how could he take the following illogical decisions for the ‘cause of his Islam.’ which purportedly resulted in the devastation of his family?
· Why did he not move over to a safe haven, like Mohammad, his alleged maternal grandpa, when he felt threatened in his hometown? Incidentally, all Messengers of Allah followed that path, when they felt insecure in their places of birth. Why did he not consider this option in the first place? · If he had no other choice but to fight, then he should have raised an army properly equipped for a final showdown with his adversaries. · He should have moved away from his adversary’s stronghold, instead of moving towards it. There, he made the biggest blunder of his life, which cost him not only his life, but that of his close relatives and friends. · He should have left women and children behind, instead of taking them along into the battlefield. Every military general would say that was the most stupid move on his part, which he adopted in face of a better equipped and battle hardened regular army. · According to the Shi’ah historians, Hussain left Mecca on the ninth of Zil-Haj, a day before the ritual of Hajj. What was the hurry to get out of the city of his ancestors, where he could be much safer, and move towards the battlefield, without proper preparation? However, this decision of his part was against Allah’s command of Jihad. · Abraham, Moses, and Jesus slipped away in the darkness of night from their respective places of birth, when they realized they were not strong enough to take the enemy head on. He should have followed the same procedure for the safety and security of all concerned. It was stupid on his part to pick up a fight, with much superior enemy forces. · Lastly, Mohammad also left his birthplace in order to avoid unnecessary mayhem, practiced the same principle a day before the battle of Badar, when he did not allow his ill-equipped loyal fighters to march on to the battlefield. He did not want to waste their lives unnecessarily, when they lacked funds to procure proper arms and ride essential for joining the fight. [9:92]
‘The people, who approached you for arranging mounts for them, so that they could join your forces in the upcoming battle, are not to be blamed for anything, since you told them, “I am sorry; I cannot provide anything for you to ride on, right on.” They went away with eyes brimming with tears, and grief in their hearts, as they lacked the funds to equip themselves with the requisites of warfare, and fight on your side for the just cause.’
The above verse clearly shows it was commendable on the part of Mohammad, to stop people from going into the battlefield, who were not fully prepared for it, though his army was short of men and earnestly required additional hands. All Messengers of Allah followed the policy of avoiding unnecessary bloodshed as far possible, and for that very reason they always fought defensive, but decisive battles. However, when the fighting became inevitable, they went for it with adequate preparation and full force on their part.
In the case of Hussain, it is obvious he did not prepare for the upcoming clash with the enemy forces, which he knew was inexorable. That was his biggest mistake as a general. Mohammad, his grandpa, is recognized as one of the best generals of all time, who always fought under duress, in the sense that as a last resort, he went to the battlefield. However, when he went for it, he made proper arrangements to ensure sure shot victory, with a minimum loss of life on his side.
As his grandson, which the Shi’ah claims him to be; he failed to do anything right from a general’s perspective, and had the sole responsibility for all casualties on his side. He committed a criminal act, as per the directives of the Qur’an, pertaining to warfare, and received punishment for that by losing his own life, along with many of his relatives and friends.
There is another side of this story. Mohammad did not have a daughter bearing a non-Arabic name, Fatima. Iranian conspirators made the biggest blunder by giving her an Iranian identity. Ali also seems to be a fictitious character created by the Iranian Aimmah for producing rift within the unified Muslim Ummah. They did need some one directly related to Mohammad, for making a claim to the caliphate, though most of the closest associates of the last Messenger of Allah were not his relatives. The constitution of the Qur’an does not attach any preference to the blood relations, though in a tribal environment it carried much importance. However, the Shi’ah conspirators of Iran did eventually play the close relative card for overthrowing the Umayyad caliphate. That is why they created the fictitious character of Ali; got him married to the non-existing daughter of Mohammad, and brought Hassan and Hussain into the world out of that union. Here a question comes to mind; Mohammad had other daughters, whom Shi’ah do not attach any importance at all. What is the reason for that? What was so special about invented Fatima that she and her family constituted Mohammad’s Ahl-e-Bait and Ale-e-Rasool, whereas his real and direct female descendants and their families find no such prominence in his life? The answer is very simple and straightforward; the matrimonial bond of Ali [the alleged son of Abu Talib, the real paternal uncle of Mohammad], and Fatima strengthened the clan of Banu Hashim, and legitimized the claim of the former as the successor to the caliphate, on the death of his father-in-law. That link placed a very powerful trump card in the hands of the Iranian conspirators, who triumphantly used it first to create differences, among Ali and other soul mates of Mohammad, and then during the tussle to uproot the Umayyad, they used it very effectively in the name of Ali and his progeny. Most of the Shi’ah historians have a consensus that almost all revolts and rebellions against the Umayyad rule originated from Iran, and the perpetrators always fought proxy battles on behalf of Ali and his descendants, the rightful owners of caliphate, being the nearest relatives of Mohammad. Ironically, when the Umayyad finally lost power after a continued struggle of one century against them, the beneficiaries were not Alvis [belonging to Ali or his family], but Banu Abbas another clan of Banu Hashim.
The badly beaten and pushed out of power Alvi clan was perhaps the most disgruntled and disappointed group of people on the face of the earth at that point in time, because their century old efforts resulted in an utter failure to replace the Umayyad dynasty with their own. Abbasid, on the other hand got into the limelight, by becoming the rulers, whereas Alvis descended into the deep shadows of failure. Despite their total capitulation at the hands of their very distant cousins, the Alvis did not give up hope. They set up their shop in an entirely different area, by inventing the strange, but to some extent a novel idea, that the realm of spiritualism is much more extensive, as compared to the worldly caliphate. They claimed their ancestor Ali was the first and greatest of all Aimmah, who in certain respects was much more charismatic, and even powerful as compared to his first cousin Mohammad, the last messenger of Allah. That was the beginning of mysticism doctrine in Islam, which the Qur’an does not endorse at all, because it clearly depicts a defeated mentality. The Shi’ah Aimmah, twelve in all, came out of that intellectual bankruptcy. Nevertheless, it is really mind blowing, why they put a stop to their own production at the allegedly ‘sacred’ number twelve. If that had not happened, by now they might have run into a few dozens, if not hundreds. Anyways, twelve-Imam Shi’ah dogma restricts the real Imamat to Ali, his sons Hassan and Hussain, and nine direct linear descendants of the latter. Additionally, this doctrine presents these Aimmah as infallible intermediaries between humans and God. The continuous presence of Imam being a prerequisite for human salvation, Al-Mahdi, the last Imam, supposedly, is existing in a state of mysterious suspended animation [away from prying eyes] since 874 A.D., only to emerge near the apocalyptic end of the world, in the form of a messiah.
The above mythological narrative is miserably out of place with the most modern human thinking. In the 21st century, people know, no one can possibly live for over eleven centuries, hidden away somewhere, because the average life span in that era was forty years. The reasonable explanation might be; he must have died incognito a few years after his disappearance at the age of five. The investigative agencies of the Western world would have classified him as a missing child. They would theorize, in view of their vast experience in that particular area of expertise, that a hard-boiled pedophile-cum-pederast kidnapped him, at that tender age; sodomized him to his heart’s content, and then got rid of him to find another bedfellow.
The fundamental tenet of Shi’ah religion is extreme hatred for all honorable and venerated companions of Mohammad, except Ali. Nevertheless, the facts prove beyond any doubt, they remained committed to the cause of Islam, and made continuous collective efforts, until the establishment of the very first Muslim government, based on the constitution of the Qur’an, in Medina. The sacrifices they made, personally, as well as jointly, for the collectively cause, under the leadership of Mohammad, are worth writing in gold. Ali, being a minor, or most probably a non-existent entity, did not participate in that struggle at all.
Undoubtedly, the associates of Mohammad, not only respected one another, but also felt a deep love for each other. The Qur’an provides overwhelming proof of that reality in the verse 48:29, presented below:
‘Mohammad is the Messenger of Allah, and his friends feel affection for one another [as a mother does for her children], because of sharing and supporting the tenets of the Qur’an. They are firm, steadfast and mighty like a solid piece of rock, for those who try to conceal or oppose the commandments of the Qur’an.’
In view of the above verse, all associates of Mohammad were decent, respectable, and selfless people, who turned into a unified force under his brilliant command. Undoubtedly, they had great regard for one another, and constituted the first family of Muslims. The Qur’an speaks very highly of them, and commends their continued efforts, which resulted in the implementation of the constitution, the last revelation of Allah presents for the benefit of the entire humanity.
Anyways, those men and women passed away almost thirteen centuries ago. They did very well in their time, but now they are simply a part of history. Nothing good can come out by remembering them, because they are dead and gone. Allah complimented all of them for their righteous deeds and the Qur’an testifies to that effect. There is nothing big about them now, because they went six feet under and are going to stay there until the end of time.
The supper structure of Shi’ah religion rests upon two fundamental principles. The first one is the vast stinking dump of self-created myths in the form of Ahadith, Sunnah not only of Mohammad, but also that of Ali and his descendants, whereas the second one is the personality cult, or rather celebrity worship. However, the Qur’an out rightly condemns the both, because Allah did not appoint Mohammad as his last Messenger, to teach and lead the Zoroastrian Nimaz, or perpetually mourn the dead, but to form a government by implementing the constitution of the Qur’an, and to show humanity, how to enjoy peace, progress, and prosperity, along with security.
The modern Shi’ah priesthood, especially in Iran, the only Shi’ah majority country in the world, has no concept what kind of constitution, and the charter of rights and obligations, along with civil and penal codes the Qur’an presents, and how much people friendly this system is. The current governments established at all levels, such as central, provincial and municipal, are neither democratic nor Islamic. In fact, everywhere there exist an awful combination of dictatorship and elements of democracy.
The Supreme Leader of Iran, of course a Grand Ayatollah, who remains in power until death, is responsible for the delineation and supervision of "the general policies of the Islamic Republic." He is the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, controls the military intelligence and security operations; and has the only power to declare war. The Supreme Leader appoints the heads of judiciary, state radio, television networks, the commanders of police and military forces, and six out of the twelve members of the Council of Guardians. Since the establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran, there have only been two Supreme Leaders; Ruhollah Khomeini, 1979–1989, and Ali Khamenei, 1989 – continuing on.
The Assembly of Experts elects and dismisses the Supreme Leader on basis of qualifications and popular esteem—no one has seen dismissal so far. The Assembly of Experts is responsible for supervising the Supreme Leader in the performance of legal duties. However, that is just hogwash, as the person under reference is too powerful for any individual or organization to take up head on. This is plain and simple dictatorship strengthened and augmented with the authority of religion.
The elected president of Iran is, in fact, a miserable wretch, who simply runs errands and carries out commands of the Supremo, though he receives a mandate from the masses at the time of election. He is in servitude to a religious dictator, which the sociologists consider to be of the most horrific kind. A vast majority of illiterate people remains apprehensive about it, and never ever dare to oppose it. They did revolt against the Shah, but would never dare to turn against the Grandiose, because this time they would be committing a grave sin, punishable in hell. The ‘opium of religion’ would do the trick and keep them in check.
There is a strong undercurrent gaining strength, especially, among the literate Iranians, that the country’s over all economic situation was much better during the reign of the Shah, which was toppled by the religious frenzy of the common people, instigated and accentuated manifold by the religious mafia of Ruhollah Khomeini and his cohorts. The alleged religious revolution of Iran has let the people down and has made their life miserable. It has been a total failure on the economic front, which the ostensible leaders of the revolution did stress upon the most, as the main premise. Now, 40/50% university graduates cannot find jobs, in the land, which used to be a thriving industrial and commercial market, where skilled people from the sub-continent used to come looking for all sorts of jobs.
The Supreme and his allied Mullahs lack the vision of turning the oil rich country into an industrial giant. It is bad luck of the Iranians that their leaders lack knowledge, aptitude, and the requisite expertise for industrializing the country. The Mullah Hegemony is corrupt to the core, and cares a damn for their citizens. However, they have made them very happy by giving them unbridled sexual freedom, through the institution of Mut’ah. The unemployed young men and women, who cannot get married due to financial problems, take out their frustration through temporary marriage, due to which teen pregnancy has increased by whopping 70%, within the last five to ten years. Incidentally, now, in Iran, 60% of the total population standing at 145 million is under 25.
Aashurah عا شو را Celebration
In the Vatican City, the Christians pull out the procession of Virgin Mary, every Sunday, in the memory of the fake event of crucifiction of Jesus. Similarly, some people belonging to certain Christian sects in Brazil and Philippines punish themselves by putting nails in their hands on the cross, in order to pay tribute to the sacrifice of Jesus.
The Iranian Aimmah borrowed that concept from Christianity, and started taking out mourning processions since 352 Higra [on the command of a Muslim king, Muiz-zud-Doulah Vailami], to commemorate fictitious martyrs of a fabricated event that supposedly happened at Karbala [a city of modern Iraq] in 62 Higra.
Similarly, when Sunnis saw Shi’ahs racking in money with all hands on the Aashoora عا شو را commemorative parade taken out for the fictitious martyrs of Karbala, they decided to cash in the birthday of Mohammad. They started taking out processions called Eid –ul –Millad –u- Nabi, consisting of bullock cart floats along with a large number of horse and camel riders, wearing typical Arab warrior dresses, in various Muslim countries.
Since every Muslim loves Mohammad
immensely therefore, Shi’ah fabricated an other conspiracy by using
the non Qur’anic term Aal –a- Rasool
The terms Aal –a- Rasool
A-
Al-a- Pharaon
B-
Al-a- Mossa
C-
Aal-a- Abraham
D-
Aal-a- Jacob
E-
Aal-a –Lot
F-
Aal-a- David
From the above Qur’anic terms it is
cleared that the terms Al –a- Rasool
So according to the Qur’anic
terminology the word ‘Aal’
Let us check from the Qur’anic how the
various Messengers of Allah used the word ‘Aal’ · First Messenger of God Noah established his nation based on the Message of Allah. His son [blood relative] was not the member of that nation because he refused to agree with his father about Allah’s law of buoyancy and he sank in the flood.
·
Abraham made his nation
based on his Book. In that nation or ‘Aal’ · Lot completed his nation based on the Allah’s Message but his wife [matrimonial relation] did not join him. · Mosses made his nation based on Torah in which Pharaoh’s wife [she came from entirely different system] was included.
·
Finally Mohammad
prepared his nation based on the Quran. He demolished all the idols
of the blood relations, Arabic tribal system, nationalism,
patriotisms, religion, region race, cast system, color , matrimonial
relation, language, personality worshipping , sects and mold a nation
purely based on the Qur’anic body of laws. In that nation the ignorant
rich leader of Mecca and the Arabic heads of Bano Hashim were
not included but Bilal from Habish and Sulman Farsi
from Iran were the members of that nation. The nation he cast was free
from senseless innovation of the terms Aal –a- Rasool
·
The Shiah cult has also
illegally corrupted the meaning of the Qur’anic term Ahal-ul- Bat
·
In verse11:73 the Quran
has used the term Ahal-ul- Bat
·
The term Ahal-ul- Bat
·
The Quran has used the
term Ahal-ul- Bat In
the presence of above Qur’anic verses it is vivid that the term
Ahal-ul- Bat The Qur’an states, Mohammad had more than two daughters, and he loved them all equally, without any differentiation. However, both Shi’ah and Sunni sects have declared Fatima and her family [ر سو ل ا ل] offspring of Mohammad, whereas other daughters and their families, had been labeled Alawi [ علوى]. This kind of parity and discrimination among siblings, based on the blood of Ali, is against the principle enunciated by the verse 17:70.
‘Mohammad publicly declare this universal command that every human being is equally honorable [irrespective of race, gender, religion, color and nationality] as per Allah’s code.’
Thus, discrimination maintained between Fatima[ non Quranic and non Arabic name] and her sisters or other daughters of Mohammad, both by the Sunni and Shi’ah sects, and differentiation of their families as Aal-e-Rasool [ر سو ل ا ل ] and Alawi [ علوى ] based on the blood line of Ali, is tantamount to absolute injustice, especially, with respect to the tenets of the Qur’an.
Alwi branch of the Shiah cult at present time are in minority in Turkey and Syria but they have powerful hold in the form of dynasty of Hafiz -al- Assad over Syria. They have barbaric kind of government over the majority of the Sunni population of Syria. The rulers of Alwi’s Dynasty from the time of Hafiz -al- Assad regime ruthlessly ruled, crushed and butchered thousands of innocent Sunni in order to keep their upper hand over the majority of Sunni population.
Furthermore, this is a despicable act with particular reference to the principle of human integrity, and rights. In fact, the creation of abysmal Darood –o-Salam, not even hinted upon by Qur’an, is an awful crime and a heinous conspiracy to bust the unity of Muslim Ummah. SHI’AH’S DISCRIMNATION OF MUSLIM UMMAH BASED ON BLOOD
Now is the time to check the reality of Fatima, Ali and their two sons, Hassan and Hussain using the yardstick of the Qur’an? First, Fatima is a non-Arabic name and does not appear anywhere in the Qur’an. Can any Muslim, with a sane mind, and in full control of one’s faculties, believe Mohammad could call his most precious daughter [as per the common belief] with a foreign name? As no Pakistani Muslim gives his children Hindu identities, the same way, Mohammad could never give his daughter an Iranian appellation. Shi’ah sect, without any exaggeration, claims to be the most faithful supporters and sponsors of Ali and Fatima, and their progeny. Therefore, it would be advisable to find out, what their most authentic book of Ahadith, entitled, ‘Usool-e-Kafi’ written by Kalinee, says about them.
According to one of his traditions, when Fatima was born, Khadija [another non-Arabic name, which is proof positive, Mohammad never married her], her mom was 60 years old. This is a blatant lie, as in the 21st century, an average woman gets her menopause somewhere between 40 to 50 years, which means she can not have any more children. How a woman in Hijaz could have a baby at 60, when the menopausal age 1,400 years ago was slightly lower, around 40 to 45.
‘Usool-e-Kafi” also states, during the second year of Higra Hassan was born. It means, at that time Fatima was only ten and she conceived him when she was just nine. Then barely six months later, when she was almost eleven, her second son Hussain come along. Here a question pops up, how could Mohammad, being a Messenger of Allah, and receiver of the last revelation, got his daughter married at the age of nine, which constitutes a blatant violation of the age of maturity defined by the Qur’an, under the Marital Law?
Following the foot print of Christianity Shi’ah sect in Iran, Iraq, Pakistan and India fabricated the myth of Pentagon. It means Mohammad, Ali, Fatima [Mohammad‘s daughter she was the wife of Ali] Hassen and Hussein [Ali’s sons]. Shiah sect has limited their dogma of Islam to five dead human beings called punj-tun- pak .It is interested to note that in the alphabet of Arabic letters the word “p” is not existing then how come Shiah has coined the term “punj-tun- pak”.
Like Hindus Brahman, Shiah has also
classified the Islam on blood relation. The progeny of Fatima[ non
Arabic name fabricated by the Shiah sect] was named Aal-a- Rasool
At present
almost 90% of fake All-a- Rasool
North Americans watch their funeral procession in which they are beating their chests with their hands in rhythm and hitting their backs with the small knives in the remembrance of the fake event of Karbala. In Pakistan every year during the month of Mohram, Shaihs hire the poor people who hit their backsides for fifteen or twenty minutes with knives. The professional beaters and hitters charged for this pious job from rich Shiahs according to their time and kind of beating. Usually in the mourning month Shiah wears black dress but the groups who beat their chests and hit their back with knives during the torturing process wear white shirts in order to make red blood spot more visible on their shirts to the by stander. In their views this is the best pious way to pay the homage to the martyrs of the Karbla. They also think that by doing this they can impress, attract more common people and can increase the numbers of their followers. God knows what type of Islam the Shiah are demonstrating in front of the whole world. This is utterly against the education of the Quran and Mohammad. This custom is a rebellious practice against the principle of Allah. Torturing, hitting and beating the body in the memory of the Karbala martyrs is heinous offence against the body laws of the Quran. I do not know what excuse they will present to Allah and Mohammad in the defense of this revolt against the education of Islam. Actually to take out the mourning procession and to give punishment of their bodies in the memories of the martyrs of Karbala have been imitated from the Christianity.
The Muslims mystics and Sufism are also the branches of the trinity tree of Mithraism and Hindu mysticism. The doctrines of Halool, Whadit-ul Wojood and Whadit-ul Shood are the main believes of the mystic cult. The simple meaning of above terminology that God is present in every thing and being a human we are the part of the God’s personality and after death every souls amalgamated in to the God personality.
Here, a very basic question pops up. Does the Qur’an instruct the humans anywhere in its entire text to celebrate the anniversary of Mohammad or worship the lion god Ali, Fatima Hassan and Hussian? If that is not so, where do the Muslims get their queue for wasting so much energy, time and money for observing those religious events? Another question is did Mohammad ever throw a party during his lifetime on his birthday, or his stalwart friends did some thing of the sort, after his passing away? If the answer to all of the three queries mentioned above is a definite no, then wherefrom the Muslims in the 21st century get the permission to do something, which never happened in the time and life of Mohammad and his associates?
The differential treatment meted out to the people, based on their social or financial standing in a Muslim society, is a despicable and unpardonable offense. Actually this nitrous net work was systematically completed under the Dynasty of Abbasid caliph in the period of 500 years. Each Abbasid caliph was corrupt right down to the very core. Collectively, they were womanizers, whoremongers and alcoholics. They loved to have thousands of concubines or, maidservants plus eunuchs for their personal pleasure, in violation of the moral code of the Qur’an. The Abbasid caliphs were the product of a decadent and a depraved culture, where fornication and adultery were the order of the day. Because of that very reason, 27 out of 37 caliphs were born out of wedlock. In other words, they were bastards, especially in accordance with the standard established by the Qur’an pertaining to slavery. Their illegal genealogical details are as under:
In Arabic language they are called
Umm- Walad
Caliph / Dynasty His Mother
Umm- Walid
Yazeed salis Princess Fairooza, daughter of Shah Afreed, Umayyad king of Iran.
Marwan Sani A concubine from Kurdistan and a former Umayyad paramour of Abraham Ashtar
Mansoor An unknown maidservant Abbasid
Haadi The concubine, Khrazan, former lover of Mahadi Abbasid
Haroon The maidservant, Khrazan Abbasid
Mamoon The maidservant, Mirajala. Abbasid
Motasim The maidservant, Barada. Abbasid Wasiq The Roman concubine, Qurtas Abbasid
Mutwakal The maidservant Shaja from the Kawarsan Abbasid territory
Mutnsir The Roman maidservant, Habshiah Abbasid
Mistaeen The maidservant, Mukraq Abbasid
Motiz An unknown maidservant Abbasid
Mohthedi An unknown Roman concubine Abbasid
Mahtmd The maidservant, Kufan Abbasid
Mahtadit The maidservant, Sirar Abbasid
Mktifuy An unknown Turkish concubine Abbasid
Muqtudeer An unknown Turkish concubine Abbasid
Qaaheer The Barbary tribe maidservant, QutoolAbbasid
Raadi A maidservant named him in 297Hijra Abbasid
Muteeqi The maidservant, Kloob, originally belonging Abbasid to Muqtudeer
Qadar The maidservant, Wamah Abbasid
Muqtudi An unknown Armenian concubine Abbasid
Mustinjid The Roman concubine, Taawis Abbasid
Mustdi The Armenian concubine, Ghuaza Abbasid
Nasir The Turkish concubine, Zumerd Abbasid
Mustinsir-Billah A Negress
Dollah Fatimyya A maidservant, his father purchased from a Jew merchant.
Misteen- Billah A Turkish maidservant
[Tarekh-ul- Ummat by Allama Aslam Jera Puri 1993]
In view of the above list of illegitimate caliphs, it is obvious that all Muslims who claim to be Sayyed or, the descendants of the Abbasid dynasty are, in fact, unlawful off springs of the caliphs, mentioned above. The clash between the Muslim Titans, Umayyad and Abbasid, established the legacy of Muslim belligerents, which paved the way for caliphs and kings to fight among themselves for territorial gains, with the intention of installing their own families in power for all time to come. Three appropriate examples from the Islamic history explain and augment the basic driving force that resulted in the slaughter of innumerable Muslims on the battlefield. These are as follows:
1. In the golden era of Muslim culture, two Abbasid brothers, Haroon- ur-Rashid and Amin-ur-Rashid [17o to 192 Higra] fought for the caliphate, wherein the former killed the latter and got the throne. In this battle around ten thousand Muslims lost their lives. 2. Zaheer-ud-Deen Mohammad Babar, the founder of Mughal dynasty in India, which stayed in place for over three centuries, captured Delhi in 1526 after killing Ibrahim Lodhi. In this clash over 100,000 Muslims perished, fighting on the sides of the greedy Muslim kings. 3. Most recently, Iraq / Iran [1980 – 88] war, claimed the lives of 1.5 Muslims. It turned out to be the most expansive but extremely futile war in the Islamic history, as both sides did not have any gains at all. On the contrary, besides losing huge number of men, on both sides, the economic destruction of the two nations was horrendous.
The Qur’an openly declares, the people of any era would never be questioned what their predecessors, or ancestors did. Every generation is strictly responsible for its activities, whether good or bad. What happened between Ali, which, in fact, is a fictitious character fabricated by the Shi’ah Aimmah of Iran, and other companions of Mohammad, has got nothing to do with the Muslims of modern times. Let bygones be bygones, and bury the history, especially, the one based on false and phony accounts, because it is not going to do any good to any one, except the belligerent sectarian Mullahs, which thrive on the warring factions. with rolling in donations. The equation is very simple; violence is directly proportional to generated funds.
The Qur’an, in the verses 14:27-28, enunciates Allah’s immutable laws pertaining to the rise and fall of nations. It is clearly stated that corrupt leaders [like BB, Nawaz Shrif and all others] take their nations down the drain by replacing Allah’s nourishing and beneficial laws with the harmful man-made legislations, just for their personal benefit and advantage. Exactly, that was what happened during the Abbasid period.
‘Mohammad, the Qur’an provides you the basic commandments, along with the historical perspective pertaining to the rise and fall of nations. Don’t you ever think about the fact; the nations, which based their administrations upon Allah’s nourishing laws, enjoyed His ample blessings, and lived in an environment of peace, prosperity and security? But, when corrupt and selfish leaders seized power, they led the caravans of their people into such markets, where the commodities, they hauled over long distances, did not have any worth at all. * Their self-centered decisions ruined the land and the people, inducing inactivity in place of creativity, in all walks of life. Affluent societies turned into wretched have-nots, because of the lust for power and voracious appetite for riches of their respective rulers. In fact, they created hell on earth for their nations, just for the fulfillment of their personal agendas.’ In the end, I would love to explain to you that we are not responsible for the deeds of Abraham, Mohammad, Jesus, Ali, Hussein, Hassain and Fatima, we are only responsible for our own deeds. Therefore we are completely free from the actions and deeds of our fore fathers, leaders and we should work hard for the peace and prosperity of this beautiful blue planet. The Qur’an clearly states the people living in the current era, are not at all accountable for the activities and deeds of the dead and the bye gone. In addition, it condemns those, who just brag about their past and do nothing worthwhile themselves, through the verse 2:134, presented below:
‘That was the party, community or nation [built by various Messengers] of the past. They were responsible for what they did. You are accountable for what you got, and are not answerable for whatever they received. ’
NOTE; above treatise has been condensed from my books. 1-The Qur’anic concept of Nikah [wedlock] VS. Religious prostitution. 2- Administrative and Economy System of the Quran. 3-Torah, Arrogance of the world 4- Jesus; warrior, Apostle
BEST REGARDS AKHTAR SHERAZI
|
|
Send questions or comments to Akhtar Sherazi |
as
a specific characteristic of His own individuality, in the form of a
custodian, a shelter and an assistant. The Muslim clerics have adopted
the same attribute for themselves. The idea behind this action seems
to befuddle or impress Arabic illiterate, unassuming and unpretentious
Muslims that like Allah; they also possess some divine qualities.
or
Aal-a- Mohammad 
to
make more confusion in the Islam and to attract more innocent and
simple Muslims psychologically, emotionally to increase the
demographic numbers of their sect.
and
Aal-a- Mohammad 
are
not available elsewhere in the Quran. However, the Quran has used the
word ‘Aal’
means
the nation of the Pharaoh or the followers and the backers of the
Pharaoh.[2:49, 3:11,7:140, 8:52, 14:6, 28:8, 40:45 and 54:41]
signifies the nation or the supporters or the companions of the Mosses
including the Wife of Pharaoh.[2:248]
stands for the nation[ without his father blood relation] or the
buddies of Abraham.[3:33 and 5:54] 
implies
to the nation of Jacob including his family.[12:6]
denotes
the nation or the allies of 
connotes
for the nation or devotees of David.[34:13]
in
order to deceive the simple and innocent Muslims. They have translated
the term Ahal-ul- Bat 
means
the unlawful son of a maidservant.
